(10-21-2014, 11:09 AM)Emile Wrote: I think it is stupid. For example i make a post On the declaration and i copy it to my computer too. Then after each x days i just repost it and wait Until the time is there.

>>> Feel free. You ceep up interaction this way, even if you are lazy about it.

Then it is also a problem with the attackers. They are the ones always in disadvantages and in need to spent hours of mindless shooting to destroy a unlawfull base. We all have seen this happening a lot of times. Or people who ask you to help defending their base. And use all ships even If it would not be allowed to make sure the attacked base Will not vanish. During this time they accept all sanctions evolving from it. Just because the defenders saved their base. While If you attack and get sanctioned (for obviously Same reasons) you only lose money/equipment. Pob makes people selfish and for That i vote a clear no.

>>> you mean in contrast to hours of midleless shooting NPC rookies ?
Or in hunting semi-valuable CODENAMES ?
Compared to the hours and days of work needed to build a base, the few hours needed to destroy one if the right amount of damage comes... oh my.
Cry me a river.

And to the sanctions : EVERY sanction should be taken serious. I agree to that.
But it´s the players fault in misusing rules, not the PoB or the game balance that is wrong.

A diplomacy stance Will never change once a station is marked hostile towards them or Lets say illegal. It is up to the owners who have a base to supply it. To add attackers can never decide when the best time is to siege, defenders can park a limetless amount of ships to make sure it haves more then enough supplies to last another x hours for the siegers to destroy a base.

>>> well , while I do agree that diplomacy does not change fast, it is possible. And the rule to declare PoB assault is to ensure interaction, not to show consistend RP / reality .
So : where is the problem in reposting your attack declaration every week or two ?

Also : Supplies are not the main problem in a base siege. The damage is.
Pack enough BS around a base and it will fall in a few hours, faster than even a fully loaded base can use up it´s supplies.
Do not pack enough BS aroud a base and it will not fall.

Don´t tell me you can ceep up a siege with a couple of bombers for days and prevent any supplies from reaching a base. You and your friends need to sleep, and I do hope you have a RL too.

(10-21-2014, 11:29 AM)Emile Wrote: Wouldnt it be a better idea to make em just indestructable? Would save a lot of qq, a base unlawfully build Will be removed by admins or are declined of building a core upgrade. Until They at least have permission of That house Because the bases are mostly build without permission and afterwards asking for permission from the lawfulls from The house Its stationed. Making it sure it has a shield and all set up so That others are forced to spent their free time in destroying it? While you As base builders make money in the meantime and hope we fail to destroy it.

You claim it is part of rp, you overlook that i could meet you ingame while doing a siege to add more rp wouldnt it be that the time to interact more? Instead of placing a reply after each timespan? It would only show That people are still aiming for a destruction of said base. Rp has nothing to do with it, the ooRP actions like additional supplying and such do have.

(10-21-2014, 09:41 AM)hades durin Wrote: This is about your choice, in my eyes a threat has to be valid for lets say 2 weeks or so and after that you have to post a new threat.
This gives security for the pob owners in the way, that you can no longer post today an assault on xy pob and attack it in 10 weeks or more...

When you vote for yes for an validity of a threat then it will be nice to post how long you think a threat has to be valid...