No Fire Zone - need a clarification - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Welcome (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=399) +--- Forum: Help & Support (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +--- Thread: No Fire Zone - need a clarification (/showthread.php?tid=137599) |
No Fire Zone - need a clarification - Sombs - 04-01-2016 You know, I'm a bit new to Discovery RP, and I'm reading more and more into the diverse rules and such of each faction. Since my friendly Core Captain's main order is to protect Freeport 11 in case of nomad attacks, I need a clarification on what's now true: Core Rules Wrote:5.0 - Freeport 11 But: CoF Rules Wrote:5. No capital class vessel shall remain within the NFZ of any given Freeport unless assisting CoF personnel or the vessel in question is granted temporary permission by on-duty CoF personnel. Capital class vessels that are asked to leave the NFZ shall do so immediately or face the full ramifications of violating Freeport laws. Most people who visited Delta know I'm the Mako standing around next to Freeport 11 with a distance of 10 klicks, since I really want to have this character not to be a stereotypical Core Captain. RE: No Fire Zone - need a clarification - Shinju - 04-01-2016 My Zoner doesn't really care about The Core laws. All Capital ships including The Core ones should stay away. But again it's just a personal point of view if you are a bad guy, then you'll ignore it. It's just another conflict of laws like The Council/Gallic law etc. You have to decide which one are you going to follow, but you must be prepared for consequences. ^_~ RE: No Fire Zone - need a clarification - Remnant - 04-01-2016 In this case, the Zoners say one thing (Zoner laws) and the Core says another. (Core laws) The Zoners expect their rules to be followed since it's their base. Though the Core expects their rules to be followed since they claim it's their duty. Not really caring that it conflicts with the Zoners. Who is in the right, is up to you to decide. RE: No Fire Zone - need a clarification - Lythrilux - 04-01-2016 Pretty much what others have said. Neither set of laws takes precedent above the other, you have to choose how you manage things. You shouldn't consider them to be like the rules. But glorious core lore is superior tho. RE: No Fire Zone - need a clarification - The Savage - 04-01-2016 Funny fact: Zoners cannot enforce their laws due to the lack of adequate line. Or, am I wrong? RE: No Fire Zone - need a clarification - Sombs - 04-01-2016 I don't trust you anymore. ^^ RE: No Fire Zone - need a clarification - Lythrilux - 04-01-2016 (04-01-2016, 12:33 PM)Toris Wrote: Funny fact: Zoners cannot enforce their laws due to the lack of adequate line. Or, am I wrong? Indeed you are. The line they use is 'in defense of bases', which includes NPC bases. RE: No Fire Zone - need a clarification - The Savage - 04-01-2016 (04-01-2016, 12:33 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:(04-01-2016, 12:33 PM)Toris Wrote: Funny fact: Zoners cannot enforce their laws due to the lack of adequate line. Or, am I wrong? The Zoner ID allows defence only if they are attacked, the other Zoner ID vessel is attacked or someone is assaulting POB - or for some odd reason someone attacks Freeports. Edit: Okay, Shinju cleared it out. RE: No Fire Zone - need a clarification - DragonLancer - 04-01-2016 And that's the difference: Core can enforce their laws. RE: No Fire Zone - need a clarification - Shinju - 04-01-2016 Zoner Laws work 10k around Freeport, you violate NFZ = Danger for Freeport = Defense of the base. |