Discovery Gaming Community
Technocracy of Auxo - Feedback - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Inter-House (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=69)
+----- Forum: A/)- Technocracy of Auxo (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=311)
+----- Thread: Technocracy of Auxo - Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=142072)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41


RE: A/) - Feedback - nOmnomnOm - 03-21-2017

(03-21-2017, 09:09 PM)Auzari Wrote:
[Image: 3WWcT45.png]


»INCOMING TRANSMISSION«

» COMM-ID: Keeper Raven
» ENCRYPTION: Secure
» LOCATION: ???
» SUBJECT:-


»STARTING MESSAGE«



I firmly believe that cooperation and exchange of information will certainly greatly benefit both groups. After some talks, we've concluded that the proposed compensation will be satisfactory.

It was a stroke of luck that one of our patrol vessels managed to contain an independant Miner vessel, most likely working for the Order or the incoming AFC transport, before the materials were mishandled.

We propose an organised operation at a specific time which shall be forwarded to your secure link. We will round up escorts for the procedures. Although, whilst we are preparing to the best of our extent, it may be beneficial to consider a fail-safe, should something go wrong.


[[ENDING TRANSMISSION]]

this is all the evidence I need to show you were lieing through your teeth in the other thread. Aside from you making a thread to try to discredit the Indy img rp and get you out of this mess, you are also metagaming now.


I would like to know what you have to prove that you know that img Indy into was working with the AFC.
All you have as far as I know is that you looking in the player list and saw us grouped. You then shadow logged us, you didnt find the AFC ship and proceeded to shoot the img in a pirate-like encounter. Even when it was running away you decided to shoot it just so that you will disrupt AFC stuff.

And now I see this rp. Again, explain how you know the connection inrp?

Or am I right to think that this is all a joke to you.

Ps: clearly now you are organizing an operation. Yesterday you cannot just say you sent a fighter to clear things out. That doesn't meet the cut.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Jack_Henderson - 03-21-2017

Can you explain how you link the IMG indie with an AFC ship that you saw at some point somewhere? Isn't that just one more time a rather accurate "guess"? Haven't we talked about these "rather accurate guesses" before? And wasn't it about Aux "guessing" all the right things about AFC already last time?

It's meh. Again.
And it somehow also sours the IMG-Aux game now, if I read the angle you are taking on this, suddenly miraculously guessing what was going on there.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 03-21-2017

(03-21-2017, 10:48 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Can you explain how you link the IMG indie with an AFC ship that you saw at some point somewhere? Isn't that just one more time a rather accurate "guess"? Haven't we talked about these "rather accurate guesses" before? And wasn't it about Aux "guessing" all the right things about AFC already last time?

It's meh. Again.
And it somehow also sours the IMG-Aux game now, if I read the angle you are taking on this, suddenly miraculously guessing what was going on there.

I swear to god, it's like you're all DIGGING for excuses to bash us and then overexaggerating the situation, which is pretty petty. Is NomNom seriously complaining that I acknowledged that the AFC exists in roleplay in the first 'feedback' post? I think you really need to take a break and to stop taking it so personally, dude.

And here's the relevant information for you, Jack.

Flight path - in order:

http://i.imgur.com/lTAtTSy.png
http://i.imgur.com/9Dp5cgu.png
http://i.imgur.com/0Ry4Pbf.png
http://i.imgur.com/rJWlcea.png

[Image: GlczyvX.png]

To which he decided to break off to possibly steal our cargo and engage. But...

And we heard in one of the IMG Convoys that they said AFC was also a good partner, as was us and would be ashamed if they fell out and had to break business. It was some time ago when we were escorting transports but it was noted. The Miner was also completely alone, without any transport, and the only transports sighted was that AFC, the escort also heard 2 AFC in system, so it's pretty safe to assume it was for them based on the provided data, since they don't go as far as Delta, but are expected to be seen in Gamma, not near Nomad Space or the Core. This isn't quite all of it, I don't want to waste my time looking for more stuff to fuel a potential argument, and I really don't want to start making huge walls of posts for every single thing done in the RP sections.

It isn't rocket science. We're an intelligence based faction, we're going to collect data.

I'm really tired of these accusations, so let's just stop, right here, right now, and chill. This isn't an 'us vs them' game.



As for anyone else, I'll answer legitimate feedback issues. We'll be writing up a code of conduct to be pinned in the RP sections, and the Lore is gonna be going through with some rewrites, nothing too major. There may or may not be a hardcore option for members to partake in, focused on more undercover work and outside of the faction activity, an optional one - of course - for those who want to try and take a different role. Expect spookies around the clock. Mysteries are to be solved.



RE: A/) - Feedback - Jack_Henderson - 03-22-2017

I am already curious how much of your "gathered knowledge" you will put into the irp conversation with IMG and I will judge afterwards. I'll comment irply then.


RE: A/) - Feedback - nOmnomnOm - 03-22-2017

So if I were to point my ship towards a location that is 100k away, you are going to draw your line to assume the ship is going there? Lol no. Why are you assuming also the ship was not traveling to minor? Hmm?

all you have is rough "intelligence" that you use. Wow a flight path! Lets use this to say whatever we want!

You talk of getting information with role play.
But where is it?

Again , and I dont care if you ignore my posts because people will read merger the less, you attacked a Indy img ship while inrp not yet knowing there was an AFC around. It was only in group. The screen you show come after, and that ship would actually be interested in getting close to you. It broke off later, and your screen make a good job of NOT showing the ship's trajectory either.

I wouldn't pay 2 mills even for that sort of fake intelligence.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 03-22-2017

(03-22-2017, 12:02 AM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: I am already curious how much of your "gathered knowledge" you will put into the irp conversation with IMG and I will judge afterwards. I'll comment irply then.

I never said I knew the IMG vessel was working with them /before/ seeing the transports move in. We were clearing the way to start our mining operation, which we did, and left.

I'd rather sort these things out via RP than by OORP means.



RE: A/) - Feedback - TickTack - 03-22-2017

Oh dear this Azurite incident is a mess... but there is one thing that I feel is overlooked.

During this whole azurite mining interaction there was little in the form of RP

There is so much more RP that could have been done here, for example they could be questioned to gain some of that valuable information commodity, You could have waited to see who would arrive to help them and draw links between what factions they're allied with. However in this case it didn't happen, it was an interaction that lasted 2 minutes from first word spoken to blue message on screen.

(03-13-2017, 12:48 PM)TickTack Wrote:
(03-13-2017, 12:44 PM)Vendetta Wrote: We will work towards improving the problem so that future interactions will be more rewarding for all parties.

I will be watching with baited anticipation. Smile





On another note, it also just appears to me that someone logged to get a blue especially when I take into consideration that Azurai said the following.

(03-21-2017, 08:40 PM)Auzari Wrote:
Because you were mining Azurite when we wanted control over it and were about to start a mining op there, which is why a fighter went out to clear the area. I mean, it's a no-brainer that we're after powerful materials.

And when asked to provide evidence which... still has yet to be seen said

(03-21-2017, 08:50 PM)Auzari Wrote:
(03-21-2017, 08:48 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: can you please provide evidence of yesterdays mining operation by the A/)
I don't have to give it to you Smile And I've already asked you to not post in this thread anymore, as you're constantly derailing it.

Azurai was quiet right in stating that it wasn't a topic for information after death it's more of a feedback thing. Now I'd like to know if there is evidence of this mining operation or is Azurai just saying another big FAT lie?


RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 03-22-2017

I'm not obliged to give out information as it's basic privacy - but I can assure you that we did mine Azurite Gas, which I've clearly stated before.

http://i.imgur.com/63AxHQP.png

Also, had that Miner complied instead of being arrogant, he probably would have gotten away or had a chat. Although, you weren't even there for any of it...?

(03-22-2017, 12:24 AM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: words

Please read the post carefully, or double check it before you hit reply. I did mention it did break off to possibly engage/intercept our cargo.

As I mentioned, let us talk no more about it, the answers are provided. No need to keep this going.




RE: A/) - Feedback - nOmnomnOm - 03-22-2017

If "you" would be so kind as to take a look at the previously posted feedback that whoever is responsible for replying to, it would be quite nice of you.
thank you.


RE: A/) - Feedback - TickTack - 03-22-2017

(03-22-2017, 07:23 AM)Auzari Wrote: I'm not obliged to give out information as it's basic privacy - but I can assure you that we did mine Azurite Gas, which I've clearly stated before.

http://i.imgur.com/63AxHQP.png

That's a nice picture... got a time stamp to go with it? or anything to verify that it was taken shortly after the incident? Oh wait... that's not even omicron delta is it....

Also I fail to see how the miner was arrogant... he actually offered to mine for you... I'd say that was downright nice of him. And your right, I wasn't there however I seem to remember someone saying this:

(03-13-2017, 12:44 PM)Vendetta Wrote: We will work towards improving the problem so that future interactions will be more rewarding for all parties.

I see no progression towards more rewarding interactions.