(03-22-2014, 05:45 PM)Zelot Wrote: ...
You still seem to be discussing reducing the number of rules, this idea is not about reducing the number of rules, it is about the idea of creating mediators, not only for reducing the amount of work, but also to create a better atmosphere among the community. Now, if you have comments about this idea, I welcome them, but if you want to continue to discuss if the best way forward is to reduce the number of rules, I suggest you create your own thread, and put forward your own idea, but this thread is to discuss my idea.
Your inability to comprehend cause and action, along with your reading incompetence never stops to amaze me. But hey... you'll get to it one day. Maybe.
As for your idea, I'll say it again, line for line... so you can understand it this time eventually.
Quote:In context of that, your idea might even work given the case that for a start of this all, the overall amount of rules that can be broken by certain individuals is dropped.
So, whilst you're already on step no. two, I'd suggest dealing with step no. one first.
With the same amount of rules we got right now, the workload of the mediators you proposed will just shift the general workload from the admin-team to external-sources (external as you mentioned the mediators would not even need to have access to the violation report).
It's outsourcing the issue. And likely a proper solution for the moment, yet not a reasonable solution on the long run if you just keep fixing the effects instead of trying to create an overall-package that's also addressing the essence of the issue.
But hey, whatever you deem fancy feedback to your idea. It's not like this forums ever had been different. Or you.