' Wrote:0.0? 1.2 is way more powerful and open to interpretation.
Someone sounds bitter.
A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay,
brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.
' Wrote:Not being a colassol sack of excrememnt towards other people, despite not liking them. Disliking someone doesn't mean you have to be a jackarse to them.
Being cordiall and not talking negatively about them in public, and not showing hostility of said sorts in the game and on the forums is what should be taken as "nice."
But of course, your definition of nice probably is different.
One word - ethics.
' Wrote:I understand that you see it as a form of 'thought control' (which I personally find hilarious) but you should ask yourself, how much would your life really change if 0.0 just stayed right where it is?
Then you might find idea that religion is an attempt at social engeneering hilariuos too.
I've stated the points in the first post. Those risen problems would cease to exist or atleast wouldn't be seen as often.
All right, this thread don't need to be open anymore.
0.0 is there to be the methodology behind the rules. There's your official statement. If you don't like it, tough. We can explain it to you, but we can't comprehend it for you. If you choose not to follow it, then...
1.2 is the enactment of 0.0. It's used incredibly sparingly, and generally only when the violator is doing something we really just flat out don't like on the server.
And Puv, we just hit you for 1.2 yesterday. You're not fooling anyone. First time we've used 1.2 in a couple months.