Must be just me then because I sort of agree with ... where did it run?
Whilst I think that it's perfectly reasonable for the liberty navy ship to attack the SCRA over the Rogue and also for the Rogue to attack the SCRA over the Navy ship, transferring bots/bats implies alliance.
You are helping someone specifically and directly. Killing one target before the other is not helping anyone directly except you. Either way, the first must die in order to kill the second.
What the kicker here is that the ship giving up the bots/bats is reducing it's chance of survival overall and increasing that of his enemy directly.
A ship in combat has a significant reduction in it's survival chances against two ships as opposed to one. That is not in question. Reducing your survial odds by helping out an enemy vessel and thereby increasing theirs however is.
The very fact that two ships are attacking one should be enough. The transfer of equipment is one step I believe too far.
Quote:As for sharing bots? You've nothing to leverage and exploit if they asplode
You have a lot less if they don't. Your now weaker and he's stronger. You are now more likely to 'asplode'.
The next time I get a chance to do this, I'll slip a nuke in there disguised as a bot...poof goes one target versus 'us' and then poof goes the other.
If you were involved in a dog fight to the death, would you then accept something down a tractor beam from someone who was trying to kill you 10 seconds before?
Really?
I'm not sure I can believe you.
I honestly don't see a bad about this. I see Coalition as Nomads. They also tried and succeeded to drive the first-known-as Alliance out of the Sol system, just like the Nomads tried to do in Sirius, more or less. You don't see Keepers whine if a BHG and Order ally up to take them down, now do you?
Secondly. Shooting same target is not teaming up. It's just ensuring your own survival chances, not your enemies. Sharing bots and battle planing of course executing of the plan is teaming up by sharing their chances of survival. Rogue so same interested to kill navy captain as it is to kill scra pilot.
But if you want to see it from RP persective, Coalition wages guerella warfare which is not open and not that often nor not that dangerous to deal with like Liberty navy. So if we take in RP argument I could question this selection of the target in the first place.
BHG and Order do not ensure each others survival against nomads. They just set priorities who to kill first to ensure their own chances of survival better. Pretty much same what Blubba said.
If it wasn't for the fact the captain of the Kitty Hawk has a relationship with a Liberty Rogue, then Schlurbi would have most likely attacked me as well, along with all other unlawfuls there.
Imo, you should stop getting annoyed at what happened. You're a terrorist, then don't be surprised if two much different factions team up to attack you.
' Wrote:You're a terrorist, then don't be surprised if two much different factions team up to attack you.
Read wiki more. Educate yourself. I don't mind then character thinks of scra as terrorist, but then you say it as a player is a bit diffrent anyway.
I don't mind being attacked by variuos factions who are hostile to each other. Man you get used to it if you play sair char as your main, want it or not. But just shooting same target and battle planing together isn't the same thing. This is what I'm trying to tell. And ID violations are ID violation..
Blah why I'm still responding. Here rules are optional in some cases if admins votes it down as it seems.
' Wrote:Read wiki more. Educate yourself. I don't mind then character thinks of scra as terrorist, but then you say it as a player is a bit diffrent anyway.
I don't mind being attacked by variuos factions who are hostile to each other. Man you get used to it if you play sair char as your main, want it or not. But just shooting same target and battle planing together isn't the same thing. This is what I'm trying to tell. And ID violations are ID violation..
Blah why I'm still responding. Here rules are optional in some cases if admins votes it down as it seems.
at this point is seems perosnal.
In which you need to privately take it up with the admin team, not whine about it pubically.
Maybe an admin should lock this, the thread ran its course and now is just dry wood for the flames.