It looks odd then. In regards to the size. If you actually plan to use these instead of easy-to-read and permanent-unless-forum-is-down way of communicating, consider splitting character box from text box. This way if you use multiple of them, computer/phone can save bandwidth having to load only one version of character box and the rest text boxes, as opposed to all the different files you would have us to suffer through.
(09-25-2017, 01:06 PM)SnakThree Wrote: It looks odd then. In regards to the size. If you actually plan to use these instead of easy-to-read and permanent-unless-forum-is-down way of communicating, consider splitting character box from text box. This way if you use multiple of them, computer/phone can save bandwidth having to load only one version of character box and the rest text boxes, as opposed to all the different files you would have us to suffer through.
I guess it may look odd to you, but i like it not being 100% steady. It's not a scan per-say in it's technical definition. To me it looks good.
I don't think you understand or have read my intention of how I will use this, so I guess just wait and see becasue I don't want to repeat myself.
also on the topic of the 2nd one being reversed... it wont change becasue it is always a cycle.... you know what I mean? you can start at any point but it will still keep going and going
(10-07-2017, 10:32 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: also on the topic of the 2nd one being reversed... it wont change becasue it is always a cycle.... you know what I mean? you can start at any point but it will still keep going and going
It would, because right when he ends talking to the camera it cuts right back to him looking away. If you reverse it would be him talking to camera then turning away and then cutting, which would make it feel more like finishing his talking and cutting off. It only wouldn't matter if the loop was in perfect sync without a sudden cut.
(10-07-2017, 10:32 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: also on the topic of the 2nd one being reversed... it wont change becasue it is always a cycle.... you know what I mean? you can start at any point but it will still keep going and going
It would, because right when he ends talking to the camera it cuts right back to him looking away. If you reverse it would be him talking to camera then turning away and then cutting, which would make it feel more like finishing his talking and cutting off. It only wouldn't matter if the loop was in perfect sync without a sudden cut.
OH i see what you mean.... but it may be a bit odd... kinda like looking at VHS rewinding.
I think it's fine. The jacket is more important to be shown first. In AFC lore it's a very important thing so if you want to take this further you can say it is a sort of statement to fix the jacket and then say waht he wants to say.
(10-07-2017, 10:32 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: also on the topic of the 2nd one being reversed... it wont change becasue it is always a cycle.... you know what I mean? you can start at any point but it will still keep going and going
It would, because right when he ends talking to the camera it cuts right back to him looking away. If you reverse it would be him talking to camera then turning away and then cutting, which would make it feel more like finishing his talking and cutting off. It only wouldn't matter if the loop was in perfect sync without a sudden cut.
OH i see what you mean.... but it may be a bit odd... kinda like looking at VHS rewinding.
I think it's fine. The jacket is more important to be shown first. In AFC lore it's a very important thing so if you want to take this further you can say it is a sort of statement to fix the jacket and then say waht he wants to say.