+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision (/showthread.php?tid=25442)
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - Jinx - 08-25-2009
![[Image: bretonianctransport3.png]](http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc79/JinxTT/bretonianctransport3.png)
the cheesy coloured bretonian insignia are "glow in the dark" ones ( faintly ) - they d look different ingame.
*thats a new thread cause i couldn t find the old one in a hurry.
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - 11of10 - 08-25-2009
Would it be able to change cargo pods as generic trains do?
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - Jinx - 08-25-2009
afraid not - they ll be mounted fixed and they ll also extend the hitbox. - may sound unfair, but since cargopods are not added as your cargo increases and your cargo is not lost when you loose a cargopod .... they are rather useless in a whole.
the pods will be part of the ship.
besides - without the pods - its just a fat head with a slight spine.
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - reavengitair - 08-25-2009
Now THATS container transport!
Great job, however, I for one would like it a little longer... unless...
Anyway, any size comparison to the Kusari container transport? (btw, the kusari container transport doesn't even look kusarian... needs reeedoooo!)
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - Andrew_Bonesovich - 08-25-2009
I like the current Shire and I dont understand why it needs replace but this looks nice. Its a shame that the cargo pods cant be made changeable, but its for a good reason. Without them it would be tiny.
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - teschy - 08-25-2009
That's great, but can you remake the Mammoth, or model a new 3000 Liberty transport too? The current one looks like it's unfinished, it's pretty awful..
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - 11of10 - 08-25-2009
Basically, it's pretty similar to the current Shire model, except for the pincer tail, and cranes above, which is a detail I particularily like. Personally, I liked the one before (the silver one, I have a picture saved on my hard drive) better. But that's just me.
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - Montezuma/Kukulcan - 08-25-2009
Please leave the shire alone, it is already good looking, and a beast in combat, i see no reason why it needs any sort of revision.
Why would you fix something that isnt broken?
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - reavengitair - 08-25-2009
Even though most people love the current shire, I really don't think it looks too much like a container transport... I've always imagined that they all look somewhat like the Kusari one... lots of cargo pods sticking outside...
However, thats just me. I prefer this new one, probably better if the cargo pods could get a different texture.
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - SevereTrinity - 08-25-2009
Don't try and fix something that isn't broken. Fix the things that need fixed.