+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Renaming carriers (/showthread.php?tid=91148)
Renaming carriers - Reptile - 12-15-2012
have a small suggestion. But if we can not make aircraft carriers, as they should be - aircraft carriers, then let's give them a more accurate description.For example anti-aircraft battleships. Aimed at the destruction of enemy small ships.And all will rise into place.
And the definition of aircraft carriers will leave for later, when people read the real purpose in combat this type of ships, understand how they should work and what it should represent.
examples:
Anti-aircrafts battleships
Carriers
to see real difference with them
guns,armor,cargohold,size...
P.S. for now they not working as carriers,and nobody will never use it as carriers,because they have nothing to give for snubs.Some trump card...
RE: Renaming carriers - Hone - 12-15-2012
Spaceships, not aircraft. Also carriers arnt even very good against snubs, thats Gunboats. And not all carriers are even in the same style. Zoner carriers are the lightest, whereas Liberty carriers are heavier than their dreadnaughts.
RE: Renaming carriers - Echo 7-7 - 12-15-2012
The names of ship classes and sub-types in Discovery are not meant to be perfect reflections of their real-world counterparts (though they do draw from them as a modicum of inspiration).
Deal with it.
PS. Please stop with your incessant threads about Carriers.
RE: Renaming carriers - Omicron - 12-15-2012
Just no.
RE: Renaming carriers - Redon - 12-15-2012
Stop comparing Discovery to naval warships.
RE: Renaming carriers - Reptile - 12-15-2012
(12-15-2012, 08:17 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: PS. Please stop with your incessant threads about Carriers.if you dont like it - do not write here.
(12-15-2012, 12:24 PM)Redon Wrote: Stop comparing Discovery to naval warships.
By the vanilla - they was called like the real ships,why now we have wrong names?
Even in starlancer was carrier with normal size and function.
Check this carrier.
RE: Renaming carriers - Cris - 12-15-2012
We should also make space submarines.
Wait.
RE: Renaming carriers - Rommie - 12-15-2012
Quote:Stop comparing game objects with real-life counterparts, stop comparing the roleplay situation with the actual, ingame situation. Those things just don't go together in this game.
This is not Vanilla Freelancer, this is not Starlancer, this is not the United States Navy.
RE: Renaming carriers - Reptile - 12-15-2012
(12-15-2012, 03:42 PM)Cris Wrote: We should also make space submarines.
Wait.
true.
RE: Renaming carriers - bloogaL - 12-15-2012
(12-15-2012, 03:32 PM)Reptile Wrote: if you dont like it - do not write here.
"I don't want anyone with an opinion that opposes mine to express it."
Hmmmmmm... Doesn't sound quite right, does it? You did post this in the "General Discussions" section after all.
I'm going to second the fact that Discovery Freelancer ships do not match up perfectly with real life ship classes and therefore you should stop trying to make it that way.