Discovery Gaming Community
One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. (/showthread.php?tid=144554)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11


RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - Typrop - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 09:29 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote:
(10-23-2016, 09:15 PM)Living Bullseye Wrote: And yet you're up here, complaining about how other people go about collecting bounties and pirating. All the while, everyone who disagrees with you is shut down by either a lack of response, or a one-line response decreeing it is invalid.
...
That's exactly the question I ask of you. Why did you quote me, and what are you getting at?

You completely dont understand the thread. But that's ok.
I disagree becasue I explained why. Can you re-read please.
...
Why did you post something off topic and assume I am angry about Junkers and A/)
You simply right now even contradict yourself

Am I against pirates and bounty hunters or am I against Junkers and A/)

Pick.
You're against anyone you disagree with, or just don't like. Also, again, not that much of a stretch to say you're mad about Auxesia, being that the group that primarily hunts AFC, is, you guessed it, Auxesia.

You keep saying it's off-topic, when I am describing the motive behind making this thread. It's very much on-topic, regardless of however much you say it isn't. You're definitely frustrated, judging from your responses to others, as well as the Polandball smugposting everyone got warned about.

It also never decreed your argument invalid, so much as I did point out that you're contradicting yourself. It's the pot calling the kettle black, very much so.


RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - Beer Goggles - 10-23-2016

So what do you want n0m? A no harm server where everyone just shouts angry RP at each over. PvP in a lot of scenarios is inevitable.

Granted good RP before engagement is nice but do you really expect 2 factions like Core and Order for example, to ask about each overs day and then have a gentleman's agreement about a fight. I'm not saying 2 line bad RP is sufficient but like I mentioned before it depends on scenario.


RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - nOmnomnOm - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 09:35 PM)Living Bullseye Wrote:
(10-23-2016, 09:29 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote:
(10-23-2016, 09:15 PM)Living Bullseye Wrote: And yet you're up here, complaining about how other people go about collecting bounties and pirating. All the while, everyone who disagrees with you is shut down by either a lack of response, or a one-line response decreeing it is invalid.
...
That's exactly the question I ask of you. Why did you quote me, and what are you getting at?

You completely dont understand the thread. But that's ok.
I disagree becasue I explained why. Can you re-read please.
...
Why did you post something off topic and assume I am angry about Junkers and A/)
You simply right now even contradict yourself

Am I against pirates and bounty hunters or am I against Junkers and A/)

Pick.
You're against anyone you disagree with, or just don't like. Also, again, not that much of a stretch to say you're mad about Auxesia, being that the group that primarily hunts AFC, is, you guessed it, Auxesia.

You keep saying it's off-topic, when I am describing the motive behind making this thread. It's very much on-topic, regardless of however much you say it isn't. You're definitely frustrated, judging from your responses to others, as well as the Polandball smugposting everyone got warned about.

It also never decreed your argument invalid, so much as I did point out that you're contradicting yourself. It's the pot calling the kettle black, very much so.

No offence, but I am having trouble understanding your prose.
Do not take it as a form of ignorance, becasue I literally cannot reply to what you wrote.

plus agian... it's off topic.
*munches on popcorn*

(10-23-2016, 09:37 PM)Beer Goggles Wrote: So what do you want n0m? A no harm server where everyone just shouts angry RP at each over. PvP in a lot of scenarios is inevitable.

Granted good RP before engagement is nice but do you really expect 2 factions like Core and Order for example, to ask about each overs day and then have a gentleman's agreement about a fight. I'm not saying 2 line bad RP is sufficient but like I mentioned before it depends on scenario.

You are taking my argument and stretching that I mean to have no pvp.
that's what you are trying to do right now. I have highlighted it for you.

I think you do not understand what Roleplay is. Roleplay is not asking about how someone's day is.
Can you please do me a favor and read my OP again. Look at how i said to answer the 5Ws and 1H . Look at what my arguments are.

I have to say your argument is invalid because you do not know what you are arguing about. You have in your mind something different than what I am talking about. I cannot respond to something like this.

(Oh look nomnom is ignorant.)
No I am not. The above is why.


RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - Beer Goggles - 10-23-2016

And you're stretching the fact I don't know what RP is.

Ever heard of people using "examples"? The term "asking about someone's day" is a short example of what you want, you want some story before an engagement notice?. Also saying my argument is invalid is ignorant, clever you already pointed out your ignorance. You asked is 2 lines enough RP I answered it's down to scenario.

But of course I. Disagreeing with you, I'm completely wrong and can't RP. And it seems you've also forgot what you're arguing about, everything bit of critique you get you go thundering your poo about how someone is wrong once again.

I dunno if you're told everything you do is right, but look at the responses in this thread, people have pointed out flaws and again you ignore them, which seems to be your theme.


RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - Yber - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 05:17 PM)Vendetta Wrote: Enemies aren't going to give you the time of day to ask where you've been. They're enemies. They aren't obliged to sit there and ask if your mom is doing well or how you've been. You're their target, they're going to shoot you the first chance they get so you don't use that extra time to escape.

not everyone has a base whose quickdock spot they can camp while looking over the playerlist


RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - Kauket - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 06:17 PM)Auzari Wrote:
Soldier's Fortune explains it pretty well. Not everyone has time to waste over FL for hours on end.

The only time I see /l1 and /l2 as an issue is when it's just one big circlejerk of people going out of their way to stomp people for the sake of stomping.


Opinion still stands. It's an actual issue to see memelords doing it.


RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - nOmnomnOm - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 09:59 PM)Beer Goggles Wrote: And you're stretching the fact I don't know what RP is.

Ever heard of people using "examples"? The term "asking about someone's day" is a short example of what you want, you want some story before an engagement notice?. Also saying my argument is invalid is ignorant, clever you already pointed out your ignorance. You asked is 2 lines enough RP I answered it's down to scenario.

But of course I. Disagreeing with you, I'm completely wrong and can't RP. And it seems you've also forgot what you're arguing about, everything bit of critique you get you go thundering your poo about how someone is wrong once again.

I dunno if you're told everything you do is right, but look at the responses in this thread, people have pointed out flaws and again you ignore them, which seems to be your theme.

You used a very ignorant example and based on your words I concluded you view as RP being nice tea sipping and crumpet talking between outcasts and corsairs.

Also I see you are just aggravating something that I have already replied to.


RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - Beer Goggles - 10-23-2016

And what point did I say my view on RP was tea sipping between 2 warring factions?

Are you ignoring the fact where I described the amount of lines of RP depends on the SCENARIO, see I even put it in capitals for you.

But hey my RP must be better than a fast and furious port who have bland and predictable RP. I mean come on your RP character is literally just vin deseil. I mean how lazy.


RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - Caelumaresh - 10-23-2016

It would seem the borderline insulting is continuing on. Keep it civil guys. We are watching this thread.

~ Cael



RE: One of those /1 /2 critique threads. - nOmnomnOm - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 10:15 PM)Beer Goggles Wrote: And what point did I say my view on RP was tea sipping between 2 warring factions?

Are you ignoring the fact where I described the amount of lines of RP depends on the SCENARIO, see I even put it in capitals for you.

But hey my RP must be better than a fast and furious port who have bland and predictable RP. I mean come on your RP character is literally just vin deseil. I mean how lazy.

Please look at the following:

(10-23-2016, 09:37 PM)Beer Goggles Wrote: to ask about each overs day

and:

[Image: zvHPwir.gif]

Oh no. cant use that crap argument anymore. No more Vin. :C