+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: "homeworld" replacements (/showthread.php?tid=37629)
"homeworld" replacements - Jinx - 04-04-2010
*shrug* as if its important anyway - then its a civilian fighter - doesn t matter anyway modelwise
"homeworld" replacements - Elsdragon - 04-04-2010
It is important, given faction control levels.
"homeworld" replacements - Cawdor - 04-04-2010
You mean because of the tech chart? Well one could still tweak the info card for it to be a failed prototype that is now being sold on the open market as civy vessel like ... er ... the RT for example. Built by IMG, flown by anyone.
"homeworld" replacements - sean24 - 04-04-2010
Ravons Talon is in lots of other mods. Its a fantastic model but replace anyone?
"homeworld" replacements - Jinx - 04-04-2010
not by me - trying to replace the ravens talon will create too much trouble.
everyone knows its a "jedi knight II/jedi academy" import - but import =/= import, - the ravens talon simply is too popular to satisfy everyone with a replace.
i d rather vote for taking it off the market for a full update cycle - and after such a "cooldown time" think of a fully new concept.
"homeworld" replacements - ugliestmoose - 04-04-2010
As a Marauder pilot, I know that the current model is an import and needs replacing, but I was secretly hoping that the replacement would keep the same shape. Almost every fighter in the mod is long and thin while the Marauder is rather unique, being circular and all. So while there's nothing wrong with your new model, Jinx, it just looks...a bit bland, I guess?
Another reason I'd want to retain the Marauder's shape is because it's very fun to fly in combat, its weird shape meaning you have to fly it a bit differently. I wouldn't want to lose that.
"homeworld" replacements - Petitioner - 04-05-2010
I do so love your Bulldog and Dacite. Seriously, that Dacite ship design you have needs to be more popular. If anyone's ever played StarCraft, think of the SCV. It's a very heavy construction and repair thing. Imagine if it were converted to be a fighting unit. That's what your Dacite reminds me of. It's just another part of the corporate gears but it's been changed up a bit and is now a force to be reckoned with, yet still capable of doing the original job. If your model gets used for the Dacite there should be NPC patrols consisting of one or two of those and an AT or something similar containing metal or something like that around "gate construction sites" and whatnot. All of these look great, but the Bulldog and the Dacite really shine, imo. Amazing work, and an A+
"homeworld" replacements - Cosmos - 04-06-2010
The basalt is a mix between the Manta, A Wrath and Civvy texturing..Awesum!
They look fab jinx, Epic work as all ways.
"homeworld" replacements - rhodes - 04-06-2010
Love em all! Can't wait to fly them
"homeworld" replacements - mang109 - 04-08-2010
I just wanted to add my name to the list of people stating " soo much win"
These ships are long overdue, Theyd better be in 4.86 for the sake of my sanity. :D