![]() |
|
Free freeports? - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: Free freeports? (/showthread.php?tid=57421) |
Free freeports? - jxie93 - 03-28-2011 It's a title, really, something to brag about. Free freeports? - Jeremy Hunter - 03-28-2011 ' Wrote:Time to time, you can also have some nice Rp in space too. Jinkusufreeport, you gotta spend time in space. *still has dibs on the name Frreport 17* Free freeports? - Camtheman - 03-28-2011 Quote:It's a title, really, something to brag about. That's SIR Administrator Primary Gaurdian Marvin James Orphelia to you! Free freeports? - Daedric - 03-29-2011 To be quite honest. I'd point anyone interested in this in Soban's direction. Even though I lead a Zoner faction, he likely has more knowledge on RP'n the admin of a station. I RP the CEO of a trading corp, two very different things. Still, my offer stands. Boa Vista. Free freeports? - n00bl3t - 03-29-2011 ' Wrote:Clearly you harbor a grudge toward the individual(s) you perceive as being responsible for the dissolution of the ZA via means that you don't even consider to be within roleplay. Although your language is circumspect, I much prefer when pretense is dropped, so I provided a more direct response, in what the dissolution of the ZA has provided to the three official Zoner factions in terms of freedoms. The dissolution of the ZA was the "fault" of none but the Zoners who were members, us included. Blame events if it makes you feel better. There may just have been more going on behind the scenes than was realized, hm? A grudge? No, not at all. But I am not about to call it role-play, since it will never be that. So, you picked up on TheJarl's off-topic post for my supposed passive-aggressiveness? I believe I said something about on-topic responses, but it appears basic comprehension was unavailable. Of course my comment was irrelevant, considering the comment I was responding to was also irrelevant. Basic cause and effect. If TheJarl's comment was about criticising the way Freeports are handled now, then of course the history of how Zoners and Freeport handling would have to be questioned, examined and explained. Previously, as you say, there was little in the way of Freeport "owners" per se, because the ZA existed. I explained how it came to be this way, and I was questioning why TheJarl did not speak up previously during the "changing" phase of Zoners. Also, if you feel like blaming the Zoners solely for the dissolution of the ZA, feel free. [TAZ] and OSI- left the "alliance" first, so I guess we know where the blame lies in the dissolution of it. I hope that clarifies things for you. Free freeports? - Dusty Lens - 03-29-2011 ' Wrote:A grudge? No, not at all. But I am not about to call it role-play, since it will never be that. Could you define role-play for us? I imagine it would be very illuminating with respect to how outsiders should perceive the events of those days. Free freeports? - n00bl3t - 03-29-2011 ' Wrote:Could you define role-play for us? I imagine it would be very illuminating with respect to how outsiders should perceive the events of those days. I think I called it a sequence of events based on pre-defined lore, which develops along the lines of lore. Free freeports? - Taneru - 03-29-2011 ' Wrote:I think I called it a sequence of events based on pre-defined lore, which develops along the lines of lore.I always thought that was called continuity. Free freeports? - n00bl3t - 03-29-2011 ' Wrote:I always thought that was called continuity. Continuity is what role-play is based upon. Free freeports? - Daedric - 03-29-2011 BLEH |