+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt (/showthread.php?tid=61124)
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - Death.RunningVerminator - 06-09-2011
' Wrote:But of course, none of what happened was Dakun's fault. And of course, none of what happens from here on is his fault either.Finally someone agrees with me!
It's just everyone "out to get Dakun", yup. No roleplay reasons. No legitimate concerns or legitimate reactions. Nope. Just everyone out to get Dakun, no other reason. We're even making up laws specifically to hurt Dakun. We just don't like him that much.
Being sarcastic guys, sarcastic.. But here's my opinion on the matter if anyone cares for it.
If Dakun is acting like it's all a joke, that's his problem. He's the one that's lost (from what it sounds like) everything.
Or! All of you can just consider this thing a big "wat" and do a quick system restore back two days ago.... Lol.
Also! Why can't we all just get along? :/
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - Dab - 06-09-2011
' Wrote:I think I'll make a BPA and accuse every trader I see of supporting enemies of Bretonia, regardless of what they're carrying.We didn't make up the law on the spot. We've done no pvp, which makes it hard to be guilty of pvp abuse. I didn't say they were contraband, I said that by buying them, you are supporting a revolutionary terrorist organization, thus helping enemies of Bretonia.
Yeah, no, it doesn't work that way. If you want to consider blood diamonds contraband in Bretonia, then they need to be published in the Laws as such. If they're not listed there as being contraband, they're not contraband and blowing up a trader who refuses to pay a fine for an interpretation of a law that you made up on the spot just smacks of pvp abuse.
That law has been there a very long time, and is fairly straight forward.
I'm not going to not enforce the laws because some people don't like them.
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - Daedric - 06-09-2011
' Wrote:Conspiracys aren't meant to be tossed out in the open. This isn't a conspiracy, it's more akin to stoning somebody out in public.
Care to comment on the fact that Dakun currently has a group of people in cap ships and he plans on putting them all in Omega-3 and shooting whatever he feels like shooting? Just like he did with his NOORP and ORI groups?
Edit: Removed - I was rather a dick with what I said.
I gave him the benefit of a 2nd chance and supported his role play as the administrator, against the wishes of 90% of the other Zoner players that make up the Zoner factions and other indy players who work with the factions. Hell, I even agreed the amount of people that went after him was absurd, until I found out he did all of this just to cause an issue.
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - Death.RunningVerminator - 06-09-2011
Question. If all of this is true.. Why is he not banned?
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - Dab - 06-09-2011
' Wrote:Question. If all of this is true.. Why is he not banned?Because Cannon is very lenient?
I hate Mr. C too.
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - Veygaar - 06-09-2011
' Wrote:No he isn't. In fact, he's planning a Juggernaut spam of Omega-3.
But of course, none of what happened was Dakun's fault. And of course, none of what happens from here on is his fault either.
It's just everyone "out to get Dakun", yup. No roleplay reasons. No legitimate concerns or legitimate reactions. Nope. Just everyone out to get Dakun, no other reason. We're even making up laws specifically to hurt Dakun. We just don't like him that much.
It's a conspiracy.
I think I see the light mate. As a personal choice, I have chosen to stay away from any of Dakun's actions. Yes it is a oorp choice. But it was a WISE oorp choice. One that I have now confirmed was also the right choice for myself.
I think what Dakun needs to realize is:
This is a game, there ARE rules and standards, and if you wish to have fun do so within them.
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - Death.RunningVerminator - 06-09-2011
' Wrote:Because Cannon is very lenient?He is.. He is.. But in a way, i think that's good. If it weren't for him, i wouldn't be here right now. And then where would the CBF be? And the RP I've brought recently? (Rhetorical question, btw...)
I hate Mr. C too.
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - Jeremy Hunter - 06-09-2011
Hate the character, not the player, even if the player is an arrogant, self centered jerk.
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - McNeo - 06-09-2011
' Wrote:actually on the Lawsuit RP,
It is actually one of our laws and the BAF policy that no member of the BAF, nor the BAF itself can be sued in a time of war.
http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?sh...p;#entry1367521
Sorry to spoil the party.
' Wrote:You won't see "Shooting a civilian" as listed against the law for most houses in this game. This is because we operate on the laws of the countries our houses are based on. For Bretonia, that means the United Kingdom. We also tend to use common sense, where dead civilians is a bad thing.
I'm pretty sure that the laws of your house are unconstitutional upon the basis of the law of Great Britain. Are you sure you base your laws on the United Kingdom?
I mean, I'm fine with them being unconstitutional, just the claims you guys are making don't quite stack up. I certainly didn't base the Liberty law on American law or their constitution, for example. Are your laws based on British law or not?
To those involved in the Freeport 1 Witch Hunt - Dab - 06-09-2011
' Wrote:I'm pretty sure that the laws of your house are unconstitutional upon the basis of the law of Great Britain. Are you sure you base your laws on the United Kingdom?They are based on British law. And special executive powers can be given to the armed forces during an emergency wartime situation, such as the one we're in. We've documented fairly extensively this gradual change based on the Kusari invasion and the events during it.
I mean, I'm fine with them being unconstitutional, just the claims you guys are making don't quite stack up. I certainly didn't base the Liberty law on American law or their constitution, for example. Are your laws based on British law or not?
Pretty much, it was an amendment to the constitution to grant the Armed Forces greater power. That happened well before the above quoted policy was put into effect.