![]() |
The Kusari Exiles - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Player Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=244) +---- Forum: Official Faction Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=245) +----- Forum: Official Faction Creation Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=134) +------ Forum: Archived Creation Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=290) +------ Thread: The Kusari Exiles (/showthread.php?tid=71205) |
The Kusari Exiles - Aphil - 01-03-2012 The fact is, whether it's West or you, someone is refusing to sign the treaty that has actually been shown to the player base. Until that treaty is signed, I doubt that Bretonian is going to acknowledge/roleplay that a treaty exists. It's also interestingly convenient that you can refer to a treaty that only exists as a name and footnote in the storyline and expect everyone else to go along with it. A treaty in which you don't have to actually agree to anything or give up any of your claims. In essence, it's not a treaty so much as fantasy, a fantasy you seem content to bend to whatever is convenient for you. It seems to me the only reason you refuse to sign a treaty that's written down is because it's inconvenient for you and Kusari. You don't want to lose anything, so you stick to a treaty that has no known terms, agreements or concessions. The Kusari Exiles - Zelot - 01-03-2012 ' Wrote:Then where is it? You will have explain your question better, I dont think I understand it. The Kusari Exiles - Tabris - 01-03-2012 I agree with Aphil, without a Treaty your free to make up your own terms and not lose a thing, until a treaty that BOTH sides agree to is in place I don't see how you can expect Bretonia to help you. The Kusari Exiles - Zelot - 01-03-2012 I have heard feedback about the treaty. I think some of us have a difference of opinions on that. I dont think it is likely to change. Possibly it is time to move on to other issues. The Kusari Exiles - Lunaphase - 01-03-2012 Considering the past history between zelot and treaties, i think their demand is quite reasonable. So far i have seen nothing but zelot attempting to get his little faction invite only, then after that attempting to powergame his way to having no weakness. The community is clearly against something like that which goes against the entire point of the ronin. The Kusari Exiles - Dane Summers - 01-03-2012 ' Wrote:Also, West is not refusing to sign a treaty. I am. Why? A treaty has already been signed. ' Wrote:Then where is it? ' Wrote:You will have explain your question better, I dont think I understand it. ok Just to make sure - Im asking - if a treaty exists, then where is this said treaty? I do not see it. The Kusari Exiles - Aphil - 01-03-2012 It's in the storyline Dane :rtfm:Didn't you read the sentence clearly describing there's a treaty? :rolleyes: The Kusari Exiles - Zelot - 01-03-2012 ' Wrote:ok It is in the storyline, it clearly says there is a cease-fire between The Exiles and Bretonia and an Alliance against Gallia. The Kusari Exiles - Dane Summers - 01-03-2012 Ooooooh! How stupid of me. Then I'll pretend it says that Ronin get all the tea and crumpets they want, and Bretonia gets access to Chimmy's and KNF guns! Cool! *goes to make his BAF chimmy with disinfector 3's* The Kusari Exiles - Zelot - 01-03-2012 Did the War between Bretonian and Kusari require the player factions to declare war for it to be valid? |