' Wrote:Why would the BS or carrier be against the rules?

' Wrote:A virtual world, designed for the most part to mirror a universe comprised of authority figures, outlaws, neutral parties, govermental coups, and everything else that makes Discovery what is it is, is just that. A virtual world designed to mirror a realistic world.

This isn't the game to play to "escape". What constitutes leisurely fun for one, does not for the other. One may come here, trade their way to a battleship, then kill everyone they see. To them they say "Hey, I worked my way into this ship, and now I want to play this game like it was actually made: A space ship combat game."

The thing is, Discovery is different. It's made to be realistic (to it's own mythos) as much as it can be.

For that, it's anything but a "leisure game", so to speak. It's fraught with it's own grudges, diplomacy, wars, and everything else that goes with the real world.

So, complaining that it's too restrictive is a bit off kilter here. Some restrictions will be put in place if it makes the universe run better in the long run. If some toes are stepped on, that's sad, but I think there's a saying. "Ends justifying the means"?

' Wrote:One battleship license per person.

' Wrote:"Ends justifying the means"?

' Wrote:I'm aware of that, but since the BAF started using nomad weapons things kind of equal kusari there, except that kusari pwns bretonia in a fight.

So if I got the liberty BS I would obviously trade in the churchill on it.

What's a good name for a liberty BS?
I think that was carved in the lynching tree outside the town in alabama I was born in.

' Wrote:I was thinking the LNS George W Bush

' Wrote:No. LNS-Obama. (We want change. :lol:)

' Wrote:Where is the change in threats by faction leaders against indies?