+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) (/showthread.php?tid=139542)
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Croft - 12-27-2016
That is one mean mother of a transport, nice work mate. Good to see you back on your feet again.
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Backo - 12-27-2016
I LOVE THE BABY STORTA!
Awesome work, Swallow!
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Foxglove - 12-27-2016
(12-27-2016, 01:12 AM)Bloodl1ke Wrote: I LOVE THE BABY STORTA!
Awesome work, Swallow!
I can only agree. I would fly this ship as RP ship.
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Swallow - 04-18-2017
OCAT is not in?
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Swallow - 04-18-2017
Is OCAT not in?
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Backo - 04-18-2017
(04-18-2017, 07:51 AM)Swallow Wrote: Is OCAT not in?
Did not see it at the initial update in FLStat so I think it's not in.
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Silver - 04-18-2017
Vasko's saaad
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Jack_Henderson - 04-18-2017
It looks awesome, but the main problem has not been addressed as far as I can say:
Pvp-opness.
Look at the Akegata, Shire. Uruz. Shishi. They are massive (especially the first 3) or at least large, bulky, high, wide. It is IMPOSSIBLE to dodge fire in them.
Your OC AT will just have to strafe to avoid fire while staying at max range and hammering targets with cruiser-like dps.
I love the model, it looks awesome.
BUT: Without major balancing thought, this one cannot be put next to all other BT without creating MAJOR in-class-imbalance.
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Backo - 04-18-2017
(04-18-2017, 11:24 AM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: It looks awesome, but the main problem has not been addressed as far as I can say:
Pvp-opness.
Look at the Akegata, Shire. Uruz. Shishi. They are massive (especially the first 3) or at least large, bulky, high, wide. It is IMPOSSIBLE to dodge fire in them.
Your OC AT will just have to strafe to avoid fire while staying at max range and hammering targets with cruiser-like dps.
I love the model, it looks awesome.
BUT: Without major balancing thought, this one cannot be put next to all other BT without creating MAJOR in-class-imbalance.
So you're saying less cargo hold isn't an imbalance? I mean if they won't implement the OCAT I could always just fly a Gull or Pelican.
Comparing a combat armored transport to a heavy hauler and saying it shouldn't be better in terms of combat is just funny.
P.S. Raba
RE: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) - Thunderer - 04-18-2017
Bison Mk 2?