+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Inter-House (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=69)
+----- Forum: .:j:. (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=85)
+------ Forum: Archives (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=300)
+------ Thread: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=14207)
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - Hidamari - 12-11-2013
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=108365
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - Daron - 12-30-2013
Roleplay matters.
I expect you take care of it.
- 'bonny lad'
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - NOVA-5 - 12-30-2013
It's not like i'm psychic or anything but saying you just put a bounty on one of my craft
for some reason i don't know about & saying that you called me on my comms in the first
place in game Mr OTC, would you care to tell me what this posts about bonny lad?
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - Daron - 12-30-2013
Sorry, but who are you?
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - GrnRaptor - 01-09-2014
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=109187&pid=1462962#pid1462962
So this.
I'm wondering what possible justification would grant you the ability to move a fully upgraded base that you didn't even build 100k+ to a location that you couldn't possibly build at today without getting totally wrecked in the process to block a jump hole that isn't even yours to control. Is this the level of RP the Junker's Congress sets for itself?
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - JunkerTown - 01-09-2014
The hole that were trying to defend is closest to our home in NL.
I am shocked a GRN would be opposed to this move!!!
Just think of all the fun we could all have pewing each other in Leeds.
Ah well..
We didn't have a choice in what happened to Leeds and were told we could move a PoB in a system that drastically changed.
Which is exactly what we requested.
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - Euca - 01-09-2014
Wait so you wanted to guard the JH that the GRN use to access NL? That doesn't sound like pews but rather powergaming to me...
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - GrnRaptor - 01-09-2014
(01-09-2014, 04:03 AM)JunkerTown Wrote: The hole that were trying to defend is closest to our home in NL.
I am shocked a GRN would be opposed to this move!!!
Just think of all the fun we could all have pewing each other in Leeds.
Ah well..
We didn't have a choice in what happened to Leeds and were told we could move a PoB in a system that drastically changed.
Which is exactly what we requested.
(12-23-2013, 10:58 AM)aerelm Wrote: Requests in this thread will be reviewed and your base moved if they meet the following conditions:
- Bases will only be moved if the system layout has undergone drastic changes between 4.86 and 4.87.
- Bases will only be relocated within the system they are currently in, unless that system has been removed with 4.87.
- Bases must have a thread in this subforum and the request must be posted with the same account used for posting said thread.
- Bases will only be moved if the changes to the system they're in have either nullified their original purpose (Bases located inside a mining field, etc) or if their new location may be considered problematic (Too close to a stellar object which wasn't in 4.86, etc).
Way to not address a single point I made with respect to your request by asuming that somehow it's because I'm in the GRN|. I knew the original builder of this base, and I know who ran it after him. Neither of those guys are you, and none of the purposes for it were to block jump holes. Would you address the original question I had now?
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - JunkerTown - 01-09-2014
(01-09-2014, 04:31 AM)GrnRaptor Wrote:(01-09-2014, 04:03 AM)JunkerTown Wrote: The hole that were trying to defend is closest to our home in NL.
I am shocked a GRN would be opposed to this move!!!
Just think of all the fun we could all have pewing each other in Leeds.
Ah well..
We didn't have a choice in what happened to Leeds and were told we could move a PoB in a system that drastically changed.
Which is exactly what we requested.
(12-23-2013, 10:58 AM)aerelm Wrote: Requests in this thread will be reviewed and your base moved if they meet the following conditions:
- Bases will only be moved if the system layout has undergone drastic changes between 4.86 and 4.87.
- Bases will only be relocated within the system they are currently in, unless that system has been removed with 4.87.
- Bases must have a thread in this subforum and the request must be posted with the same account used for posting said thread.
- Bases will only be moved if the changes to the system they're in have either nullified their original purpose (Bases located inside a mining field, etc) or if their new location may be considered problematic (Too close to a stellar object which wasn't in 4.86, etc).
Way to not address a single point I made with respect to your request by asuming that somehow it's because I'm in the GRN|. I knew the original builder of this base, and I know who ran it after him. Neither of those guys are you, and none of the purposes for it were to block jump holes. Would you address the original question I had now?
I am not surprised you feel that I didn't address your question.
No answer I give will satisfy you.
So you knew the original builder of the base.
Do you know how long we've owned it?
Anyway as stated
[*]Bases will only be moved if the changes to the system they're in have either nullified their original purpose (Bases located inside a mining field, etc) or if their new location may be considered problematic (Too close to a stellar object which wasn't in 4.86, etc).
The base no longer serves the purpose WE purchased it for.. years ago.
Perhaps you have a better suggestion on where we should move it?
RE: .:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback - Independent Miners Guild - 01-09-2014
Quote:Reasons: Leeds has fallen into Gallic control. The base is no longer viable as a fuel depot as Mox cannot be obtained at LD14 anymore. Now the station will serve as a last line of defense against the invading Gallic horde. The location was decided because of the close proximity Leeds jh is to Trafalgar located in NL. Junkers trying to defend the back door from its enemy.
Please... not another senseless blocking base.
If there is a base covering that hole, it should be BAF-IFFed.
Definitely there should not be a ragtag Junker base guarding a House system.
That makes zero sense irply (at least for me) and it is also harmful for gameplay, as every blocking base it.
//sorry, wrong account. It's Jack, obviously.