![]() |
|
Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Server Events (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=411) +---- Forum: Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=28) +---- Thread: Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT (/showthread.php?tid=6176) |
Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - Exile - 05-10-2009 The balance doesn't realy make sence to alot of GRN. In total, I think we have like one bomber in the 'fleet'. The council get 2 cruisers and one GB. If those pilots have half a brain, the VHF's die within a few minutes. I'd suggest adding either a Valor to the GRN side or reducing the number of Cruisers/GB's on the other side. Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - Black Widow - 05-10-2009 ' Wrote:The balance doesn't realy make sence to alot of GRN. In total, I think we have like one bomber in the 'fleet'. The council get 2 cruisers and one GB. If those pilots have half a brain, the VHF's die within a few minutes. I'd suggest adding either a Valor to the GRN side or reducing the number of Cruisers/GB's on the other side. True true i agree no cap whoring we should have a maximum of 1 cap per team at most say 1 gb or cruiser each and the rest all fighters bombers mixed. Do you think that sounds good Exile ??/ i know how GRN love to hunt in their Overpowered Caps, lets bust out some Hardcore battle Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - Exile - 05-10-2009 I'd suggest you secure that arrogant little mouth before poo hits the fan:dry: But yes, one cap per team sounds good as well. Or just plain figther mumbo. Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - Lightfoot - 05-10-2009 ' Wrote:I'd suggest you secure that arrogant little mouth before poo hits the fan:dry: What? What? But you Royalists are already the accepted "Masters of le Migrating Merde", mais non? We would not dream of challenging your supremacy in that small matter! If the Royal sphincters should tighten too much over trivial numbers, I shall volunteer to stand aside. le Comte Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - tazuras - 05-10-2009 ' Wrote:The balance doesn't realy make sence to alot of GRN. In total, I think we have like one bomber in the 'fleet'. The council get 2 cruisers and one GB. If those pilots have half a brain, the VHF's die within a few minutes. I'd suggest adding either a Valor to the GRN side or reducing the number of Cruisers/GB's on the other side. Both sides have 2 cruisers registered, the GRN has at least 4 bombers registered, what's the problem? Two other things:
Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - Black Widow - 05-10-2009 ' Wrote:I'd suggest you secure that arrogant little mouth before poo hits the fan:dry: now why be rude?????????????, Dont even start now I swear To GOD DONT Little Boy!!!! Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - Faidd - 05-10-2009 What the hell, Widow? May I remind people that last week it was GRN fighters and Bombers against a Council battleship, and was it a gunboat? Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - SevereTrinity - 05-10-2009 I'll bring my battleship this time, most likely. Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - Ponse - 05-10-2009 tooo many Cap ship on GRN side i think its not a fair fight. we have only 3 bombers what we must dooo in this batle ??? :nono: Weekly Battle Slot # 12: Sunday 1900 GMT - Exile - 05-10-2009 ' Wrote:now why be rude?????????????, Dont even start now I swear To GOD DONT Little Boy!!!!My characters 'dislike' for the Les Vampires leader is flipping onto me I think:dry:oh, did I say that out loud? Anyway, I agree. The caps was abit of a poo-up. We were told via skype that there were battleships on your side. Which proved to be, well, bull. Next time's gonna be different. |