+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: Harvester (/showthread.php?tid=10647)
Harvester - Zapp - 07-23-2008
The LWB have a Rheinland Pirate Cruiser as their flagship (I just bought the Cap VII for it today >.>), don't replace it, just add, OK?
Harvester - Jinx - 07-23-2008
here are the pro and cons about replace / adding:
replace : chances are good to get it into the game ... however, it will mess with non-harvesters RP - especially as that ship is special and cannot be used by a "common" pirate.
addition : i can meddle with "interesting effects" such as custom sound effects ( like the marsflier ) and non-engine grapics - instead a glow or a pulsating light. - however, chances are small to have it completely added, especially as it benefits only a minority of people.
my other idea was to replace one of the battlestars with it ( i have scrapped the talarca and the liner models - the talarca is needed in its current shape cause its neutral - the liner was rubbish ) - but i think the =CR= wants the battlestars in the game... so i cannot replace them either.
Harvester - Dusty Lens - 07-23-2008
What about the Huntress?
Already sold in the right place.
No one uses it.
It's rubbish (due to current size/shape etc. Not for any reason I know if which would impact this vessel).
It's an import.
This would be a huge improvement upon that vessel.
Harvester - ScornStar - 07-24-2008
I would agree with Dusty but if we replace that means it assumes the stats of the Huntress, which would have very strage turret placement compaired to this ship shape.
' Wrote:The LWB have a Rheinland Pirate Cruiser as their flagship (I just bought the Cap VII for it today >.>), don't replace it, just add, OK?
Could the LWB lobby for a Hessien criuser? School me, if not. I pay for it for ya Zapp. Beside you have 1,234,568,778,990,876,543 active RPs and 2 factions going right now, but if thats not a possible option then lets think of one.
Harvester - Dusty Lens - 07-24-2008
' Wrote:I would agree with Dusty but if we replace that means it assumes the stats of the Huntress, which would have very strage turret placement compaired to this ship shape.
Turret placement and such can be changed. Hardpoints can be moved or added to, but not detracted from.
Harvester - ScornStar - 07-24-2008
' Wrote:Turret placement and such can be changed. Hardpoints can be moved or added to, but not detracted from.
Cool I really dont want 12 turrets on this thing 9 is fine.
Harvester - Walker - 07-24-2008
If the Pirate Cruiser is a Star-Destroyer... I am so flying one...
*points to sig*
Hey wait a minute; How the heck do we manage to get ALMOST all Star Wars ships... But only ONE Star-Destroyer!?
Anywho... That Ship looks nice; It reminds me of the Bret Battleship a Little but it would work nicely... Heil Harvester 00!
Harvester - Dusty Lens - 07-24-2008
Thankfully firing archs could be adjusted to compensate for that!
Much like Jinx has opted to do with the BHGunship, causing only four turrets to fire forward.
Harvester - sovereign - 07-24-2008
I will be happy when I see a fighter to go along with. Nice model, but if there is the beautiful cap and no fitting fighter there will be even more cruisers than before. I don't like the sound of that.
Harvester - ScornStar - 07-24-2008
We are a NPC farming, cap faction. Its the way we are is there something wrong with RPing that?
Fighter are not cost effective. This battered horse needs not another beating. Besides our main fighter is the Kith Som Taaw SHF we have had this discussion often. This is supposed to be an evolution of our higher intellects. We dont spend time on failed models. 30 million = 1 equiped fighter. Easily killed = no harvest to take home = dead Harvesters.
1 cap cost 110 mil = fewer deaths and more profit.
We spend more to make more and keep more.
Any more then PM me and we can scype. (does anyone have a working mic?) every one type chats lets talk.