Discovery Gaming Community
Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Discovery Mod Balance (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=31)
+---- Thread: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. (/showthread.php?tid=112605)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Durandal - 02-28-2014

If you want to see a server population of 50 a day, sounds like a great plan.


RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Keioff Xanjer - 02-28-2014

Sorry to say, but this seems like a poor attempt at sniping.

Considering your previous post, I find it hard to believe that you're genuine about this.
Sorry if I am wrong.



RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Kazinsal - 02-28-2014

I thoroughly support the genericization of the Z-series.


RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Divine - 02-28-2014

(02-28-2014, 12:25 PM)Remilia Scarlet Wrote: Corsairs and OC need to have SRP only caps above cruisers (like anyone else including Houses). For smaller factions - SRP above GB (Scylla, Blood Dragon Cruisers + Togo, Council caps). In short only Houses and huge unlawful factions and quasi-houses must be able to fly up to Cruisers without SRP, those are: Houses, Corsairs, OC, Hessians, Order. That's all.
Though I'd like to see a mid-way about the Ranseur. The Sarissa could and should stay open to those that want it, the Ranseur, as the vanguard flagship of Nacion, should eventually be SRP-only. Though on this with an exception, every official faction gets one by default on request. (which would cap the current number of Ranseurs down to two).

(02-28-2014, 12:27 PM)Durandal Wrote: If you want to see a server population of 50 a day, sounds like a great plan.
This.


RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Zen_Mechanics - 02-28-2014

(02-28-2014, 12:35 PM)Divine Wrote:
(02-28-2014, 12:25 PM)Remilia Scarlet Wrote: Corsairs and OC need to have SRP only caps above cruisers (like anyone else including Houses). For smaller factions - SRP above GB (Scylla, Blood Dragon Cruisers + Togo, Council caps). In short only Houses and huge unlawful factions and quasi-houses must be able to fly up to Cruisers without SRP, those are: Houses, Corsairs, OC, Hessians, Order. That's all.
Outcasts?
Though I'd like to see a mid-way about the Ranseur. The Sarissa could and should stay open to those that want it, the Ranseur, as the vanguard flagship of Nacion, should eventually be SRP-only. Though on this with an exception, every official faction gets one by default on request. (which would cap the current number of Ranseurs down to two).

(02-28-2014, 12:27 PM)Durandal Wrote: If you want to see a server population of 50 a day, sounds like a great plan.
This.


Going defensive when something is being taken away from you I see, stain exposed. Delete both Sarissa and Ranseur.


RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Divine - 02-28-2014

(02-28-2014, 12:39 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote: ...
Going defensive when something is being taken away from you I see, stain exposed. Delete both Sarissa and Ranseur.
You're an idiot. Go away.
And sue me for calling you an idiot, like I'd care.


RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Highland Laddie - 02-28-2014

Quote:This is not sarcasm. If we have finally matured enough not to give factions toys they would not have IRP and only got them for the sake of PVP balance, we might as well take a look at the rest of the shiplines. The Xenos could use a dedicated battletransport. So could the Gaians.

Gaians and Xenos don't necessarily need their own dedicated battletransports, as they both have access to the Civilian line, or just open them up for using PTrans if they can't already.


RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - HuggieSunrise - 02-28-2014

its vary subjective... this balance stuff.. balance is like thats unknowable "perfection" everyone around here wants to attain.

Its unknowable and unapproachable. it will never happen. As for ships factions "need" cant they speak for themselves? cant they find modelers "themselves". and more importantly put an end to these third party concern threads that have stepped on toes and pissed off factions for over 6 god damned years now?


RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Lonely_Ghost - 02-28-2014

(02-28-2014, 12:35 PM)Kazinsal Wrote: I thoroughly support the genericization of the Z-series.

Haven't Saber being generic long ago, together with Eagle? There are lot's of places, where you can purchase those, and there are no particular faction, holding control of those ships and any exclusive rights. I mean, every factions, which can use it by lore, having Saber being sold on one of their bases.

Also, Saber has 100% on anything, which is not house navy. IMO, it' already generic.


RE: Re-purpose of other non-sense-make faction shiplines. - Kazinsal - 02-28-2014

Sorry, I meant Z-line (which is the pirate/rogue/molly line).

It's weird that in lore we have a Z-series and a Z-line.