+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: GMG heavy fighter (/showthread.php?tid=11496)
Pages:
1
2
GMG heavy fighter - kingvaillant - 08-22-2008
Looking at the size of the ship, I'm sure there is an A/C system in there as well as a Microwave and a bed.
In short, The ship seems too big, it is Over loaded with wings, engines, etc.
GMG heavy fighter - Blodo - 08-22-2008
I fully second AoM's motion. It's a nice fighter, but not quite GMG. Perhaps experiment with a shape similar to the current Taiidan? The wings would also be used in a slick but back oriented manner to help navigation in gas fields but not hinder movement too much.
GMG heavy fighter - Jinx - 08-22-2008
hm - alright, i ll withdraw the design from igiss then. - the idea was indeed focussed around the use of wings ( as the only place to logicly - if ever - use them would be nebulas ) - and since i dislike horzontal wings - cause they make a ship appear like a plane so easily, i made them vertical ( like the dragons fin ).
proportions and size match that of the dragon, btw. ( with the exact same cockpit size and ship length ) - however the dragon "looks" bulkier and is a bit shorter on the front part of the ship, cause its solar panels are extended horizontally. - k, back to the making another concept then.
GMG heavy fighter - Qunitinius~Verginix - 08-23-2008
Wow, very interesting. It looks like a cross between a Rheinland ship and a Bounty hunter ship. I like it, but I'm not really sure if it fits the GMG style. Good job though.
Verg
GMG heavy fighter - Cawdor - 08-24-2008
' Wrote:I'm really against this. Blood Dragon isn't a HF at all, it's a VHF, with class 10's and all.
If you mean giving it class 9's tops, then that means a nerf, since it's agility is much higher then current BD's.
I'd say keep the stats as they are now, nothing wrong with it. It's actually one of the best balanced HF's.
Also, one more thing worth of mentioning is that a LOT of people do consider GMG line as a civilian one.
So you have Xenos flying Taiidans, Zoners flying Taiidans, IMG flying taiidans, SCRA flying taiidans etc etc.
Making an uber (BD like) ship out of it won't help the gameplay.
Of course, it depends on the size a lot, and I can't judge that at the moment.
As for the model itself, it has nothing in common with the bomber. I don't know why, but it looks totally different to me.
On first look, it reminds me of Loki (and whole Asgard line).
Now it reminds me of a mixture between Loki and new FA bomber, the one that you designed.
It's a cute model however.
Its due to the info cards that stat that all those ships were created for the open marked. something that needs a fix IMHO. There is the singer for example, which was a join project between IMG / GMG, so its ok. But I think this line should be exclusive, thus the info cards changed
GMG heavy fighter - AdamantineFist - 08-24-2008
Looks like a Hammerhead combined with a Dragon to me. I sort of like the design. Very unique.
GMG heavy fighter - Orin - 08-24-2008
I really do like it... not GMG in my opinion. As stated before.
Perhaps it could be worked out as a Kusarian BHG fighter sold on Deshima? The BHG do already have a lot of ships though.:unsure: