+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+--- Thread: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=117978)
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Ryummel - 07-16-2014
Reavers copycat judging by the diplomacy then.
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Faze Mercenaries - 07-16-2014
Thanks for the most un-helpful feedback Ryummel...? Anyway...we didn't copy Reavers. Just because someone uses similar Bounty Board, doesn't mean we want to be like them. As I said before, our Bounty Board decision isn't done yet, we are still deciding who to work for. So before you judge by saying "copycat", see what we have said before you post useless feedback. Thank you...if you have any more feedback that doesn't include saying "copycat" feel free to ask.
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Ryummel - 07-16-2014
As helpful as Lyth, we both pointed it out from the post you made mentioning kusari and rheinland lawfuls and IMG. Oh the coincidence.
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Thyrzul - 07-16-2014
(07-16-2014, 06:54 PM)Faze Mercenaries Wrote: And what do you mean "Play this out with Fl ID"? Is the FL ID restricted to Bounty Hunting?
Apparently it seems to be. Don't you tend to read the ID you choose to use?
Freelancer ID Wrote:Freelancer
Freelancers are people not affiliated with any faction in particular. They generally operate independent trade ships or small ships. They sometimes act as mercenaries, but mostly just explore Sirius, taking the odd job here or there to pay for fuel and supplies.
Pilot carrying this quasi-lawful ID is a Freelancer, who:
- Can attack any ship in self-defense or to protect an friendly or allied ship.
- Can fulfill any bounty and escort contracts, and may treat transports as combat targets when executing a bounty or escort contract against them.
- Cannot use any transports with more than 3,600 cargo, except for the Pirate Train.
- Cannot participate in unlawful actions except as described above.
Allowed ships: Fighters, Freighters, Transports, Gunboats
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Faze Mercenaries - 07-16-2014
And what's your point? FL ID says ANY Bounty Contract.
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Thyrzul - 07-17-2014
(07-16-2014, 10:12 PM)Faze Mercenaries Wrote: FL ID says ANY Bounty Contract.
My point? You asked a question here:
(07-16-2014, 06:54 PM)Faze Mercenaries Wrote: Is the FL ID restricted to Bounty Hunting?
And I answered it. But if we are at it already...
(07-16-2014, 10:12 PM)Faze Mercenaries Wrote: FL ID says ANY Bounty Contract.
What is your point? Are you trying to say you will antagonize Liberty through bounty contracts?
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Faze Mercenaries - 07-17-2014
I am well aware of the FL ID actually. It was you who seemed confused. Liberty is a enemy inRP to Toru, but we won't shoot them without Bounty Contracts. For now, we will be ignoring them when we see them, since we aren't signed up on any board.
And when I said "ANY Bounty Contract" why did you mention Liberty? Sure they are lawful, but we never said specifically who we will work for, no? Don't jump to conclusions to fast.
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Teerin - 07-17-2014
(07-16-2014, 07:32 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Seems kind of Reaverish and not too original. I can't blame you though, it's not like working for the Liberty Lawful boards is actually any decent
Actually, the Liberty Bounty Board pays a lot of cash, and sends fortnightly payments out to its contractors. This coming weekend will be the next time, in fact
EDIT: Oh and just for once, it would be great to have a merc group that doesn't shoot at Liberty. It's not as if we don't have a truckload of players and factions pewing us already. I mean, I understand that it's Sato's roleplay, but you could have kept that character as a solo freelancer and made another one to start a faction. But oh well, carry on
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Faze Mercenaries - 07-17-2014
We were talking about that actually. I do want to have Toru help Liberty, as in bring back loyalty ( since he thinks there is none in Liberty ). Also he spent a lot of time with the unlawfuls, and they can betray family for a simple bribe. Like I said, we haven't decided the future for our Boards we want to play for.
But seeing how judgmental everyone is saying we are copy of "Reavers", you are very wrong. We took zero inspiration from them. Even though we might be on some same boards, and have a similar recruitment, means nothing. The soul point of the faction is being loyal to contractors, that is as far as I know, the opposite of what Reavers do. That is also why we are considering Libertys Bounty Board, maybe the constant " You are Reavers, shut up " will stop. So I hope that is clear to those that still think we are "Reavers".
RE: Faze Mercenaries - Feedback - Thyrzul - 07-17-2014
(07-17-2014, 04:21 PM)Faze Mercenaries Wrote: I am well aware of the FL ID actually. It was you who seemed confused. Liberty is a enemy inRP to Toru, but we won't shoot them without Bounty Contracts. For now, we will be ignoring them when we see them, since we aren't signed up on any board.
All the "confusion" was that you gave no explaination about how you'll intend to act upon your hostility towards Liberty, how you intend to represent it, especially with an ID not allowing initiation of combat merely based on personal diplomacy. I assumed something and wanted to make sure my assumption is correct, so I asked, you answered with a yes and everyone is happy.
(07-17-2014, 04:21 PM)Faze Mercenaries Wrote: And when I said "ANY Bounty Contract" why did you mention Liberty? Sure they are lawful, but we never said specifically who we will work for, no? Don't jump to conclusions to fast.
I mentioned "antagonizing Liberty" because Liberty was* listed as hostile in both the faction's lore and diplomacy sheet, though I expected it to be evident enough not to warrant any questions. I discussed nothing about Liberty's lawfulness, even less about who you might work for in the future, so I frankly got no clue what conclusions you may suspect from me. Perhaps it's not even me who's quick with conclusions here.
*Edited: I see you changed that since the last time I looked at that page.
*Edited: I see you changed that since the last time I looked at that page.