![]() |
|
Bounty Hunting - rule clarification. - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Bounty Hunting - rule clarification. (/showthread.php?tid=129473) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Bounty Hunting - rule clarification. - The Liberty Rogues - 05-17-2015 Yes, and last time I played, Pirates could down a trader's shields without making a demand without risking a sanction. RE: Bounty Hunting - rule clarification. - oZoneRanger - 05-17-2015 Freelancer ID Can fulfill any bounty and escort contracts, and may treat transports as combat targets when executing a bounty or escort contract against them. ---Ok..so, If I am a Freelancer IFF ID ship, I cannot take or claim a bounty on another Freelancer IFF ID ship?..... Is this right? Since as a Freelancer I am not hostile to other Freelancers? I can see a new requirement on bounty boards in the future to help clear this up.......Screenshot proof of Rep at the time of the action, just like proof of death, maybe it is being done already on some boards? RE: Bounty Hunting - rule clarification. - Sol - 05-17-2015 You can shoot freelancers m8. RE: Bounty Hunting - rule clarification. - Fluffyball - 05-17-2015 Afaik, generic IDs (Freelancer, Miner, Pirate) are exempted from the IFF rule. Also, this: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=129414 Follow your logic, this is a lawful bounty. This is why I'm asking about clarification, because if lawful bounty = bounty made by lawfuls no matter the target, BHG are allowed to attack Kruger in spite of them being corporates + being red to Kruger. |