(05-13-2016, 07:31 PM)Sangria Wrote:

(05-12-2016, 08:57 PM)sindroms Wrote: I would suggest against doing so, unless you want the Lane Hackers to fall in the same problem as Rogues were before the Hyena revamp.
Rogues only had a heavy bomber and a light one at 90% core.

Lane hackers, however, can use a heavy bomber at 90% as the Waran, where the nerf is less noticeable. Give it a befitting buff, but leave it as a light bomber.


EDIT: Alternatively, you can go on with the suggestion I did back in LR- times and make all Zline ships with the exception of the Gunboat and Cruiser as generic pirate ships.

Its a borderworld bomber just like the Cutlass.

Also, don't forget to check the Havoc II which is worse than the Broadsword.

(05-13-2016, 10:15 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote:

(05-13-2016, 07:31 PM)Sangria Wrote:

(05-12-2016, 08:57 PM)sindroms Wrote: I would suggest against doing so, unless you want the Lane Hackers to fall in the same problem as Rogues were before the Hyena revamp.
Rogues only had a heavy bomber and a light one at 90% core.

Lane hackers, however, can use a heavy bomber at 90% as the Waran, where the nerf is less noticeable. Give it a befitting buff, but leave it as a light bomber.


EDIT: Alternatively, you can go on with the suggestion I did back in LR- times and make all Zline ships with the exception of the Gunboat and Cruiser as generic pirate ships.

Its a borderworld bomber just like the Cutlass.

Also, don't forget to check the Havoc II which is worse than the Broadsword.

why is that?
I think the Havoc is ppretty ok.... no?
At least it is not as fat