+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: News and Announcements (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Thread: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment (/showthread.php?tid=147191)
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - sindroms - 01-19-2017
(01-19-2017, 05:30 PM)Alex. Wrote: If a faction FR5s only a specific member of a group, does that allow the whole group to treat them as hostile targets?
I am not currently familiar with such cases, where a single tagged character is made hostile of a larger active player group (official or unofficial) specifically by the FR5ers as a request. My overall memory recalls only tags in a whole being FR5ed, rather than individual members of an existing one.
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - Sombs - 01-19-2017
Good thing!
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - Divine - 01-19-2017
Transports are not to be seen as combat targets. What about piracy for those IDs allowing it? Can make the trader drop all his cargo?
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - nOmnomnOm - 01-19-2017
Yay I can freely engage junker congress and gmg| without a bounty on them at non-transports.
Too bad congress only flies the salvager which is a GB / transport .
(its a joke chill)
Nice little thing
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - Wesker - 01-19-2017
So does this mean RHA is at war with IMG
Lol
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - nOmnomnOm - 01-19-2017
So does this mean the outcasts are at a civil war again?
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - Emperor Tekagi - 01-19-2017
(01-19-2017, 07:12 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: So does this mean the outcasts are at a civil war again?
They were since months already again. Now even more sides who can shoot each other though.
But nice that's finally clarified in the rules, no need to ask twice anymore now.
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - Jack_Henderson - 01-19-2017
The change is not massive, and I understand where it is coming from.
As someone who thinks that FR5s should be used as a a "last method", I am always sceptical when I see it becoming stronger and therefore more attractive in the eyes of some. Now, you can FR5 someone and then go on to shoot him.
In the case of "civil wars" (which - if we are honest - have never been a good idea), the explicit Admin permission is not necessary any more (permission to shoot your own ID), and the FR5 tool could become more attractive especially in the context of removing unwanted rivals inside the ID via pvping them off after FR5ing.
That's why I would ask the staff to very carefully weigh in on FR5s, especially when they are directed at the own ID. There can be repercussions that could potentially be really dirty.
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - Altejago - 01-20-2017
Braces for =LSF= kreig on DSE)
RE: Admin Notice: FR5 amendment - Liberty Security Force - 01-20-2017
We in the LSF look forward to the added roleplay this change will bring.
: )
Really though, neat change that should hopefully solve the problem of certain people being unable to rulewise fight back in some situations.