Discovery Gaming Community
Delta pewpew announcement: TONIGHT - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Server Events (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=411)
+---- Forum: Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=28)
+---- Thread: Delta pewpew announcement: TONIGHT (/showthread.php?tid=147661)

Pages: 1 2


RE: Delta pewpew announcement: TONIGHT - Backo - 02-04-2017

(02-04-2017, 05:21 PM)Sanja Wrote: Lies, you won't get any blues if you have people like you or wesker in your team.

Wesker got none in KNF event :3


RE: Delta pewpew announcement: TONIGHT - Pepe - 02-04-2017

(02-04-2017, 04:55 PM)Sanja Wrote:
(02-04-2017, 02:56 PM)Pepe Wrote: I don't see bonus helping fairplay in any way. So far bonuses were the magnet for preorganized groups of players that log on winning side to pick some safe bucks. They got rewarded, we said thanks for participating, so they come again. We had more participants for events. All looks good.

But people that play for fun got spanked. They mumbled for a while, then they grew up and left Disco - or joined bonus hunters. I beg to differ and not grow up.

But I can make some bonus event next time, so all stay around, please Wink

Your argument about the 'bonus hunters' would make sense if one side got better bonus than another. Event rules worked out pretty well, I can't see why they should not be implemented.

True. Or would be true if bonus hunters log before balancing is done. But that would make them just like any other silly player. So they log smart, on the winning side, as I mentioned up there. From my previous experiences, you personally were helping balance so far, but thanks for further clarifying this.

However, in order not to hunt windmills here and now, next pew I will put in a form of real event and ON TIME. This one I couldn't, I dealt it late yesterday, so it's just a pew announcement. Core raided Gamma yesterday, no one logged to defend, I was told too late and we simply owe them a pewpew - and apology.


RE: Delta pewpew announcement: TONIGHT - Jack_Henderson - 02-04-2017

Tnx Pepe for organising. Strategy worked. Spartacus wing is good fun.

And: Not your responsibility that the Core decided to "nope" it by piling in the Cruisers.

Keep making events. Smile
Kudos to Sairs for just being Sairs.


RE: Delta pewpew announcement: TONIGHT - Implosion - 02-04-2017

(02-04-2017, 11:24 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Tnx Pepe for organising. Strategy worked. Spartacus wing is good fun.

And: Not your responsibility that the Core decided to "nope" it by piling in the Cruisers.

Keep making events. Smile
Kudos to Sairs for just being Sairs.

Cruisers were piled to cover Legates and Murmies as initially, we weren't expecting any battleships.
Generally, this is what happens when the event is not pre-made with even numbers. It's not that easy to balance things midfight, because it's well, rather chaotic.
Further more, the event started with more corsairs than Core and by the end of it, it was the other way around.


RE: Delta pewpew announcement: TONIGHT - sindroms - 02-04-2017

There is a reason why we encourage people not to point out negativeness in the Kudos thread. If you have feedback to give, send it to the faction's feedback thread. Please do not do this sort of thing.


RE: Delta pewpew announcement: TONIGHT - Jack_Henderson - 02-04-2017

(02-04-2017, 11:36 PM)sindroms Wrote: There is a reason why we encourage people not to point out negativeness in the Kudos thread. If you have feedback to give, send it to the faction's feedback thread. Please do not do this sort of thing.

This rule is for Kudos thread.
This is the Event thread.
Did you mix it up or is it not allowed to write what I did in the event thread also? Because that would be new.
Just asking for clarification. Smile


RE: Delta pewpew announcement: TONIGHT - sindroms - 02-05-2017

I did not state it in green, so please take it as a suggestion rather than a rule statement.