![]() |
|
Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +---- Forum: Sanctions and Warnings (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=43) +---- Thread: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" (/showthread.php?tid=150982) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - CPTMUTCHELL - 06-23-2017 Hello! RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - CPTMUTCHELL - 06-30-2017 AALLLLOOO!!!! IS ANYBODY HERE??? HEY, STOP IGNORRING! RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - sindroms - 06-30-2017 Your provided information is being discussed. RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - CPTMUTCHELL - 07-15-2017
RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - sindroms - 07-15-2017 Your explanation has been discussed. However, from what we can see and interpret from the evidence provided to us, we find you are guilty. Unless you have concrete evidence to provide us in return, the sanction stands. RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - CPTMUTCHELL - 07-16-2017 Do you mean if a player isn't engaged for 20-30 mins he is still in combat? If yes, I have nothing to add , but I don't see it in the rules. It's wrong to punish players for violating the rules, which aren't written. How could I know I was still in combat(again, There were no enemies around for 20-30 mins, even not because I say so, according to DSAce, but you weren't provided with screens) if there is no a word about it??? RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - CPTMUTCHELL - 07-24-2017 Bump again(my dsace has one hour less): [08.05.2017 21:33:13] [LN]-Kate.Albey: There he goes. He flees the scene the first time as we got capital support -here i was in fight but decided to escape. [08.05.2017 20:36:18] 2017-05-08 20:36:17 SMT Traffic control alert: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" has requested to dock -here I docked and logged another my char in conn(No hostiles were around) [08.05.2017 20:37:35] RNS-"Duelist": Selam -it was in conn(so i left the fight) -prove [08.05.2017 20:42:33] LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy": neeh help? -I asked it in group chat(I logged tragedy) [08.05.2017 20:47:30] LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy": wp-norf? - here at 20:47:30 i didn't know where was the fight, so I was alone, no hostiles [08.05.2017 21:53:42] LNS-Chattahoochee has set LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" as group target. - I was set, but no proof I was under attack, it doesn't even matter, because of 17mins gap. [08.05.2017 21:55:46] 2017-05-08 20:55:47 SMT Traffic control alert: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" has requested to dock -that is what was shown on the screen RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - CPTMUTCHELL - 08-13-2017 Hello again, I've already lost the hope, but this made me fight again: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=152746 You said there that he had needed to engage again, my situation is the same(18 mins gap), but again, no proof I was being shot by a reporter or someone around, I was only set as the target. RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - sindroms - 08-14-2017 Processing such reports with not a lot of visual evidence is always annoying as the person who lands the sanction will always have room to dispute it. From what we as the staff see from the logs apart from the visual evidence of the docking message is an encounter that starts from [08.05.2017 21:27:55] and apart from a 10 minute pause, ends at [08.05.2017 21:55:46] with your docking message. During this time you have killed a player, as well as your comment about a ''round two'' which meant that you were involved in a ''round one''. You were involved in a PVP encounter. Docking within the range of any of the participants on the hostile side (actively contributing to the fight or not) would result in your PVP death, no matter what ship they fly or if they have personally shot you or if they had arrived during an ongoing fight. There is no way we can enforce this rule in any other way, unless we make a hook that announces text-wise as to what player damages who. Your sanction stands on the basis of docking before a hostile player who was present during an engagement you were an active part of. You were told this multiple times now. RE: Player Sanctioned: LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy" - CPTMUTCHELL - 08-14-2017 Quote:and apart from a 10 minute pause, ends atBut it was 20 mins pause from the logs you sent above! [08.05.2017 21:33:29] LNS-Chattahoochee: Savage: You're welcome. [08.05.2017 21:53:42] LNS-Chattahoochee: CD Yes, I was involved it round 1, which ended at 21:33:29(last evidence from the logs) and yes, I was in fight Round 2 started [08.05.2017 20(21):57:54] LRD-"A_Liberty_Tragedy": Mitchell: Round two -here I "re-engaged" after docking, Quote:Docking within the range of any of the participants on the hostile sideI thought I had left the fight(round 1) because of 20 mins gap and they had to engage me again, as you confirmed at Hampshire's sanction(he had to engage again because of 20mins+ gap). And as I was ONLY selected as the target and no one shot at me, I docked with the thought I wasn't engaged. Upd: Quote:Your sanction stands on the basis of docking before a hostile player who was present during an engagement you were an active part of.That is what I try to reject, I try to prove that the engagement I was a part of(round1) had gone and I wasn't in fight while I was docking. |