![]() |
|
Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +---- Forum: Discovery Mod Balance (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=31) +---- Thread: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers (/showthread.php?tid=156813) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Titan* - 01-03-2018 Battlecruisers only 10ms slower than any Cruiser. You have to play very carefully when fighting against a Battlecruiser, it can get close before you realize RE: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Chills - 01-03-2018 (01-03-2018, 02:13 PM)Shelco Wrote: After a few fights against the new battlecruisers in the Coalition destroyer I have noticed one major issue: Speed. Why are destroyers, small ships with low armor and power core, slower than battlecruisers? It's a pain to fight them and once they have you in a certain range you are doomed, as you are unable to thrust away due to their speed. Why is the normal speed of a destroyer 69ms and 129ms while thrusting? A battlecruiser has 79ms in free flight and 119ms while thrusting, the difference is so minor that you can barely get away from those ships. So what are you suggesting? Do you want to make battlecruisers slower? Then you will have an even easier time killing them with battleships then you have already now, and next to this you will even have a easy time killing them with cruisers. Then what? What are BCs useful for then? They are meant to be cruiser hunters after all. If you have to deal with them and you are on a cruiser, stay on mortar range. And get some backup that is capable to deal with the bc. Afterall, you are flying a cruiser. A small fast annoying thing, equipped with your 2 pulses and mortar, with the ability to slowly drain any battleship on a range where they can only barely touch you. While I have to agree that this isn't working that smoothly in duels, in fleet combat cruisers are a dangerous foe. And disco is not a game to have your silly cap duels in the rp environment, but to clash each other in groups. RE: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Shelco - 01-03-2018 (01-03-2018, 02:33 PM)Titan* Wrote: Battlecruisers only 10ms slower than any Cruiser. You have to play very carefully when fighting against a Battlecruiser, it can get close before you realize Extremely carefully as I have noticed. I will have a closer look at the fights against battlecruisers in the future. Chills Wrote:They are meant to be cruiser hunters after all. I might be wrong but I am pretty sure battlecruisers were always meant to be battleship hunters due to their long range weaponry and speed compared to them. Before battlecruisers were changed they were very vulnerable to cruisers. If the update has changed this then that would explain the difficulty. RE: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Chills - 01-03-2018 (01-03-2018, 02:41 PM)Shelco Wrote:Chills Wrote:They are meant to be cruiser hunters after all. Yes both cruisers and BCs were too tough targets for battleships. With the recent changes the BCs were made vulnerable to battleships but a danger towards any cruiser. RE: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Thyrzul - 01-03-2018 (01-03-2018, 02:41 PM)Shelco Wrote: I might be wrong but I am pretty sure battlecruisers were always meant to be battleship hunters due to their long range weaponry and speed compared to them. Before battlecruisers were changed they were very vulnerable to cruisers. If the update has changed this then that would explain the difficulty. Sounds like you completely skipped the latest Cap rebalance update. RE: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Chronicron - 01-03-2018 (01-03-2018, 02:41 PM)Shelco Wrote: I might be wrong but I am pretty sure battlecruisers were always meant to be battleship hunters due to their long range weaponry and speed compared to them. Before battlecruisers were changed they were very vulnerable to cruisers. Unfortunately. Everyone forgot the Battle- part in "Battlecruiser" name and what they are meant to be. A hybrid of a Cruiser and a Battleship, meant being superior above both classes at the same time. An agility of a cruiser and a Battleship's Firepower were something that made them unique, but at certain point, people forgot about bombers, and gunboats and then, the saltage has accured. Battlecruisers were slowly turning into battlecruisers as we know them right now. RE: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Exe - 01-03-2018 Anything before this bad update was better, Cruisers had a sense. Now Destroyer Turrets are nerfed, Mortar range nerfed and it turret turn speed sucks now, you cant mortar snubs anymore. Also the whole cruiser class is useless now. Battlecruisers can win cruisers now easily and still win battleships. Way to op. Please bring all the old stats like before this update back. Also undo those cruiser agility nerfs. That just sucks RE: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Skorak - 01-03-2018 Battleship>Battlecruiser>Cruiser>Battleship is basically the idea at this moment. RE: Destroyers vs. Battlecruisers - Felipe - 01-03-2018 Well BC's in past been BS killer tools, and in recent rework (NERFFFFFFFFFF) turned in cruiser killers. I was big fan of BC's before and the only one i ride now is because is the only cap i can use in that specific tag. If i can use a BS instead, ill do. Either a BS or a heavy cruiser, not a dessie. I would like if old stats where back, even if just for a week (so i kill shooter some more times ) But i dont think will happen. As someone said to me "thats it, adapt or leave" as i couldnt leave, im using BS's and Heavy cruisers instead BC's and light cruisers |