+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Discovery Mod Balance (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=31)
+---- Thread: GC "Orchid" Bomber/FA "Mamoru" Bomber (/showthread.php?tid=17451)
Pages:
1
2
GC "Orchid" Bomber/FA "Mamoru" Bomber - farmerman - 03-10-2009
As to the argument about size, would it be possible for someone who isn't already involved in the debate (that is, neither Dab nor Mjolnir) to post a side-by-side comparison so it can be easily seen?
GC "Orchid" Bomber/FA "Mamoru" Bomber - SevereTrinity - 03-10-2009
Martin (Mjolnir) had a very good size comparison of all the Kusari bombers, the GMG bomber, Roc mk2, and a few others, why not ask him nicely?
GC "Orchid" Bomber/FA "Mamoru" Bomber - mjolnir - 03-10-2009
Copying from the other thread:
Size comparison of new as well as old ships is here:
http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff111/rytirm/kus2.jpg
Note that the Catamaran(old 4.84 model) shown there is 10% larger than 4.84 catamaran, since it was enlarged for testing.
GC "Orchid" Bomber/FA "Mamoru" Bomber - farmerman - 03-11-2009
First off, I apologize if my comments didn't sound so nice. The Dab/Mjolnir debates always fire me up. And thanks for the link!
That said, looking at numbers and size comparison, they all look quite similar except that the GC Bomber seems to be wider. Perhaps increasing the armor slightly to compensate? On the magnitude of 800-1000? That would put it slightly above the other, thinner bombers, but be compensated for by the extra width, right?
Just a suggestion.