![]() |
|
Capital Ship Point Defense - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Thread: Capital Ship Point Defense (/showthread.php?tid=17826) |
Capital Ship Point Defense - Grumblesaur - 03-15-2009 ' Wrote:Kurosora: People should know what they're getting into when they buy those ships. They're -Heavy- battleships for a reason. Capital Ship Point Defense - zeinstruktor - 03-15-2009 Well yea I agree. If I were to buy an RM BS, I'd have a full cap-raping setup and rely on fighters to do my bidding... Capital Ship Point Defense - Cosmos - 03-15-2009 i can has Harvester Cruiser? Yus! Harvester Cruiser it is, therefore.... RAZOR SPAM... Capital Ship Point Defense - Tenacity - 03-15-2009 ' Wrote:Well yea I agree. If I were to buy an RM BS, I'd have a full cap-raping setup and rely on fighters to do my bidding... If only everyone on the server who flew a capship had an army of fighter minions to follow them around 24/7... Does everyone don a clock blindfold when discussing capship balancing issues? Capital Ship Point Defense - Blackvertigo1 - 03-15-2009 [rant] ...I hate these modified missile turrets, the only cool part about em is the effects and the instant-rape of NPC fighters (thats if your shooting at them strait-on, other than that your draining energy). Flaks, hear they suck, thats a -have-been- and solaris turrets... yeah. [/rant] Capital Ship Point Defense - Niezck - 03-15-2009 Not adding to the constructive debate going on. *poof* Capital Ship Point Defense - Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever - 03-15-2009 Ugh, the missle turrets suck, hey if we got the old ones back, i would be happy, and the LPI would have donuts and the RM would have vodka and life would be good. And, Niezekc, Try to fly a battleship with a load of nomad NPC's that you can do nothing about besides a couple fail turrets. really, go try it, you need to. btw, WAHH I WANT MY BOMBER TO BE ABLE TO SN LF's WAHHHH Capital Ship Point Defense - stewcool - 03-15-2009 My little rant about large ships My destroyer needs escort destroyers to take on 4 BHG destroyers. 2 alone can barely take em on and even when theres 4 v 4 they still almost kill someone. Capital Ship Point Defense - Niezck - 03-15-2009 Quote:My destroyer needs escort destroyers to take on 4 BHG destroyers. I lulz'd. Then I serious'd. Say that sentence back to yourself. Infact, I'll add in some key words that make it clearer. "My ONE Destroyer needs escort destroyers to take on FOUR BHG Destroyers." What part of that seems unbalanced? Capital Ship Point Defense - Grumblesaur - 03-15-2009 ' Wrote:Waaaah. I want my winship to be able to beat anything! Waaaah. I want to be able to destroy anything without dying! Waaaah. Why won't you let me proclaim myself the uber lord of all and go around sirius, blowing everything sky-high for the lulz? Waaaah. /signed Heavy Battleships aren't meant to be shooting fleas. It's like using a shotgun to kill a fly - not going to work well. |