(02-08-2021, 10:27 AM)Toaster Wrote: Bit of a shame that this is lore-wise just a fighter with a bunch of stuff slapped on - not really a cutter anymore, which is something I actually quite liked as a concept.

What constitutes as a "Cutter" in FL tho? Far as I know that term has never been used anywhere other than this one ship's infocard, and even here the infocard doesn't elaborate on what that's even supposed to be and the ship itself lacks any unique characteristic or functionality to define that classification (unlike Salvager being a "frigate" for example).

Current infocard for easy reference:

Spoiler

Series W "Makhaira" Border Worlds Cutter

In the wild frontier outside of House influence, one can never be sure what to expect. Pirates, targets of opportunity, alien attacks, and any number of other unforseen circumstances may arise. From this fundamental truth, the Makhaira was born. With the ability to function as a raider, patrol ship, deep space scout, or heavy strike craft with only a minimum of reconfiguration, the Makhaira swiftly became a mainstay for many smaller organizations that cannot afford to commission more specialized craft.

 
If it's just a matter of lore fluff in its infocard, I doubt the infocard of the ship itself would actually be changing, since the actual description of the infocard fits the new model just as much as the old one, so it'll most likely still be called the "Makhaira Border Worlds Cutter" just with the "Series W" designation dropped, but if there's some unique functionality to the ship that I'm missing, or if there's some common headcanon about that term in FL I'm not aware of, I'd be more than glad to hear about it and see if it can be incorporated into the new mesh as well.

(02-08-2021, 09:06 AM)Save My Soul Wrote: So tired of your *****, ae.

I'm sorry you feel this way, but you kinda forgot to mention what the problem actually is. This is the first time you're voicing any of these concerns (at least in places I can see), and even your posts here just vent about there being a problem which you seem to be sick and tired of already despite having given me no feedback about it at all until now. I can't read minds, so unless you tell me what the problem actually is I wouldn't know what to fix.

Is it the visuals of the model? Is it the lore tweaks behind it? Is it the proposed tech cell shift? or is it something else? What exactly is it you don't like about the proposed remodel and what would you prefer to see happen to the ship instead? Help me understand these and I might be able to tweak the ship in a way that'd make you dislike it less, otherwise, I can't fix the issue when I don't even know what the issue is supposed to be.

(02-08-2021, 09:06 AM)Save My Soul Wrote: What's that got to do with Falchion?

Pff, jfc... Do you understand that you can just ruin someone's plans when so easily, spitting on everything except your own wishes, moving ships into completely different groups, eh? But ofc you don't care. You convinced that you make things better , yah-yah. So tired of your *****, ae. Just make it besides of IW shipline, as a brand new ship, gosh.

(02-08-2021, 02:38 PM)aerelm Wrote: What constitutes as a "Cutter" in FL tho? Far as I know that term has never been used anywhere other than this one ship's infocard, and even here the infocard doesn't elaborate on what that's even supposed to be and the ship itself lacks any unique characteristic or functionality to define that classification (unlike Salvager being a "frigate" for example).

(02-08-2021, 02:38 PM)aerelm Wrote: Is it the visuals of the model? Is it the lore tweaks behind it? Is it the proposed tech cell shift? or is it something else? What exactly is it you don't like about the proposed remodel and what would you prefer to see happen to the ship instead? Help me understand these and I might be able to tweak the ship in a way that'd make you dislike it less, otherwise, I can't fix the issue when I don't even know what the issue is supposed to be.

(02-08-2021, 02:56 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: You can always just SRP the old model. Don't know if it would ever pass QA again though.

(02-08-2021, 02:38 PM)aerelm Wrote: I'm sorry you feel this way, but you kinda forgot to mention what the problem actually is. This is the first time you're voicing any of these concerns (at least in places I can see), and even your posts here just vent about there being a problem which you seem to be sick and tired of already despite having given me no feedback about it at all until now. I can't read minds, so unless you tell me what the problem actually is I wouldn't know what to fix.