+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+--- Thread: Colonial Diplomacy (/showthread.php?tid=19025)
Colonial Diplomacy - matt_jh - 04-09-2009
Maybe we just need to see CR and IMG as two different groups that have some ties instead of saying CR is IMG.
Colonial Diplomacy - bluntpencil2001 - 04-09-2009
' Wrote:Maybe we just need to see CR and IMG as two different groups that have some ties instead of saying CR is IMG.Too many holes.
It leaves the Bretonians wondering why they tolerate three bases in their systems belonging to a group (IMG) that harbour a group (CR), and supply them with ships and arms,
who are at war with them.
I'm not seeing how anyone's behaviour has to change if my suggestion is taken up.
Colonial Diplomacy - matt_jh - 04-09-2009
Okay then why not just give them there own bases so they are not with the corsairs or img. They have what half a dozen different BSG ships? That would only need two bases to sell them all. After all they are not pirates or miner.
Come on folks post you ideas even if they get shot down how can they hurt.
Colonial Diplomacy - Dusty Lens - 04-09-2009
The mining ship is not an IMG vessel persay. To clear that point up.
As to the rest of it... Heh, good luck with that. *runs screaming*
Colonial Diplomacy - farmerman - 04-09-2009
A "Colonial" IFF would also be a solution. It does seem to be one of the bigger player factions here. I'm sure there could be a use for it on other servers, too.
Colonial Diplomacy - bluntpencil2001 - 04-09-2009
' Wrote:A "Colonial" IFF would also be a solution. It does seem to be one of the bigger player factions here. I'm sure there could be a use for it on other servers, too.I was trying to avoid unnecessary import terms, whilst not making suggestions for people to piss off and play elsewhere.
Colonial Diplomacy - Derkylos - 04-09-2009
Hows about if the CR moved to Order tags? Keeps their "kill all AI" thing (possible problem if they go with Corsairs, due to the Harvesters' connection to Corsairs), keeps their "side with 'Sairs" thing, and doesn't really upset their current diplomacies much.
The ship issue, I really don't think is an issue any more. The only BSG-esque ship left is the Charon, which is an open-market ship, anyways.
Only problem I can see is that they would have to change their current battleships to Osirises.
I often wondered why this offensive wing was associated to a seemingly more defensive, neutral, civilian corporation.
Colonial Diplomacy - Zelot - 04-09-2009
Honestly sounds more sour grapes than anything else. Seems like people just don't want anyone that can help Kusari in the taus. Aside from the idiociy of IMG backing Bretonia while they have a kusari bs outside their main base and the war started with kusari backing IMG over BMM.
Colonial Diplomacy - matt_jh - 04-09-2009
But why would IMG want a war just because BMM has a bone to pick with them. After all a war in the taus really only hurts IMG cause it is their backyard.
Colonial Diplomacy - Niezck - 04-09-2009
@Zelot
Since when are we backing Bretonia? We have an agreement within Orkney, yes, but simply because of the *new* (Or rather, should be new) discoveries there.