+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska (/showthread.php?tid=21117)
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - Cosmos - 05-29-2009
wow, OORP NPCs much?
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - ophidian - 05-30-2009
Its an OORP NPC Fleet there.
Its about my faction rep with LN, true. The problem is, why is my faction's battlecruiser dont have the same rep with LN? You have priviledges of not being ripped apart if you have a battlecruiser by the npcs? If so, I can go get a loan and buy one.
It still doesn't fit. If its the rep, well its not my personnal rep, its what the Order asked me to have by those missions so I believe its the ORDER's REP in total towards others. I am, while flying as a Commander of the Order Primary FLeet, not representing solely my self but the whole Order as well as a body. All agents do.
So its... strange that my battleship doesn't feel the same way.
PS: I remember doing all the missions against BHG, not Liberty Navy btw.
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - cudanny - 05-31-2009
This is osmething that needs to bee fixxed, simply removing the patrols like the suggestiong above would fix this problem.:P
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - Cellulanus - 05-31-2009
' Wrote:It still doesn't fit. If its the rep, well its not my personnal rep, its what the Order asked me to have by those missions so I believe its the ORDER's REP in total towards others.
Well, by that logic RM should be allied to Corsairs, because killing just about anything in Rheinland will raise their rep.
Missions do have side effects that are the result of NPC relations, these are unavoidable without causing larger glitches to fix them.
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - ophidian - 06-01-2009
LN patrols not showing after vectors 3-2-1 in Alaska shouldnt be a problem or cause too much glitch i believe.
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - n00bl3t - 06-01-2009
' Wrote:Wait- Order NPCs are still not hostile to LN NPCs?
That is odd.
*Nods.* (Personally, I think it is ridiculous.)
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - Heartless - 06-01-2009
I agree. It's annoying flying in Alaska, getting shot at by the Navy yet Order npc's just fly right by.
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - JakeSG - 06-01-2009
I'm not sure if it's possible, I thought it'd been brought up before and was actually implemented around some bases, but perhaps an exlusion zone or something for a few K around the base where they won't initiate combat?
Regarding neutrality of Order and Navy, perhaps it's similar to the player stances against each other? We have similar goals and attempting to annihilate each other when we're both formidable forces and surrounded by alien parasites would be a waste of lives and firepower and downright stupid. The presence of each faction benefits each other even if one is a 'terrorist' group, so they stay out of our backyard, and we stay out of theirs.
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - ophidian - 06-04-2009
So you are saying that the only feasable way to correct this is for LN or Order to offer a peace or non aggression pact to the other one ? o.O
Atum being Neutral to LN in Alaska - Inconcessus - 06-05-2009
@Johann Brunhild
Here is the order's faction info:
ALLIES:
Corsairs, Zoners, Hogosha
ENEMIES:
Bounty Hunters, Liberty Navy, Liberty Police, LSF
and so on and so on...
So basicaly it is the NPCs who are wrong here, as raising the Order rep itself has a negative impact with said groups standing towards us.