' Wrote:Now as for a fully dynamic economy, that coin has two sides. I can't really know how it'd turn out, but what I know is that there could be problems with it seeing we don't have that many players.

' Wrote:Oh and, another thing. If such a thing would come to pass, I'd think we need to make commodities like food, water, oxygen, and the likes profitable.
We could do that simply by making a say, 5k transport hold, I'm just guessing here, 60k food. You get the picture, anyways, and yes, it is possible to do.

1. For example, Oxygen, food rations and stuff like that are mandatory on any kind of starbase-ish thing. The more remote the starbase is, the higher the demand (as it was reflected in prices in original Freelancer). Please bear in mind, the base would not STARVE if the players do not ship to it, because they certainly have their very own personnel to take care of that manner (as most bases are owned by someone else anyway, having contracts set up). But with dangerous times, there is always the risk that these commodities become short in supply. So players might help out that way, yes, totally, and get their reputation for doing that.
   Despite that, some "bases" should not be affected by the demand at all... I mean, Norfolk station? Battleship Missouri? They are in the lap of Liberty and there should be no problem at ALL to support these bases. So its not done with shifting prices according to "mandatory" commodities, but rather shift prices for "mandatory commodities at locations not easily accessable". And frankly, as in original Freelancer, those price differences are already balanced out. If you say, that nobody uses such trade routes because they are not profitable, then I say "then do one of these routes every now and then BECAUSE of RP. period."
   
   
2. Personal use goods like consumer stuff and cardamine and artifacts and whatnot. Their demand is not really mandatory, and its very difficult to flood/cut off the market with such commodities, so the price shifts would be rather slim, if anything. There will always be a constant flow of demand and availability to those. Also, we should bear in mind which bases would be affected by that and which would not be. The next thing, to those professional traders which are PART of a Faction that is exactly doing a majority of transporting; you take the place of some NPCs that we see along the line, you are fulfilling the contracts and stuff like that. Just out for RP reasons, the money from these trades should be forwarded to someone else, as you are only the transport of the goods and not the buyer / seller. But ignore what I just said, that would completely go out of bounds if I chase that thought.
   So; these types of commodities should only shift in a few credits of price, if anything. Perhaps this would change something on the long run, that is left to witness.
   
   
3. The last category is something like the mentioned engine components, ship hull paneels, and the like for ship production or similiar things. This is based off a set production line. It would say; "We need a specific number of the materials X, Y and Z to produce 1 unit of product Beta." So, after a certain number of shipment is brought, the halls of the shipyard (for example) would say, "our quota is full. We no longer need Material B, please wait for the next cycle". So this commodity should effectively be prohibited to be sold, or have a ridiuclously low price that equals a loss for certain. It would be activated again when the next "cycle" starts (server reset? 6 hours?).
   
   Another note on this; there are only so much products produced. One should NEVER be able to draw of an indefinite pool of something that takes time and effort to create. So nobody should be able to purchase hundreds of thousands "engine components" if there is only a limited number produced. Alas, there should be a "stock" on the station which allows only that much trading until the next cycle is done.
   

1. Is there a need to create a dynamic economy just to get rid of the powertraders? NO. Changing the prices from the hands of the server admin would do for that matter.
   
2. Should proper RP by transporting lowpriced goods which are direly needed be rewarded? YES. But not with money.
   
3. Are there enough player traders out there to justify a shift in economy on the long run, judging of how many NPCs there are out, transporting? No, I honestly do not think so.
   
4. Should Factions like Universal Shipping or BMM or ALG or whoever is big enough be able to alter the prices of certain commodities? Yes, why not? Depending on RP, reason and consequence, it is something that definitely is worth looking into. These would be manually edited files, thus providing only manpower, and not a database which could cause instability and lagg. Also, these would be worldshaping events, so something the whole community would feel! :yahoo:
   
5. We must never forget that MINING would also be affected by a dynamic economy. It soon could be deemed worthless, if certain stations are flooded with the material "they need". I think its also sufficiently done with the logs and manual reshaping of prices. I see no need to jeopardize the stability of a server just to "balance" mining?