Discovery Gaming Community
Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision (/showthread.php?tid=25442)

Pages: 1 2 3


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - AJBeast - 08-25-2009

Ooh , I like it. Especially the Bretonian simbol in the front. Usually when people try to do that it sticks out like a sore thumb


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - Colonel.Tigh - 08-25-2009

what about the kusarian container transport? that one needs a new model, ok this Bretonian one is great, but so is the current.
Dont know were the Kusarian comes from, buts is as ugly as it gets.


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - reavengitair - 08-25-2009

Quote:what about the kusarian container transport? that one needs a new model, ok this Bretonian one is great, but so is the current.
Dont know were the Kusarian comes from, buts is as ugly as it gets.

Pretty much agreeing with you here.

The Kusari Container Transport might as well be liberty... or civilian...


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - El Nino - 08-25-2009

A firefly replace?


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - reavengitair - 08-25-2009

Quote:A firefly replace?

*snap*

Thats what needs replacing!

Good thinking.

Ill vote for this to go to a firefly replace then...


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - Belco - 08-25-2009

i liked the current shire, but this one does look better.
it better be able to mount the huge amount of turrets still though:)

and there are definitely a few transport models that need an update


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - carlabrams - 08-25-2009

While this looks nice - just because the ship is made in Bretonia doesn't mean that it's being FLOWN by Bretonians. Look at any of the major long-haul trucking companies. Sure, they have their nameplate on the truck - Peterbilt, Mack, Volvo - they don't make that a major part of the paint job. You see a big orange truck going down the road, you know it's Scheider truck lines - regardless of who made the tractor or trailer. THAT kind of modifications would be cool.

Nothing personal, but I don't consider the Shire to be currently broken in any way. It has the containers under the lunch box handle now (which is how I view the ship), and it works fine.

Replace the Firefly - fix the Hitbox on the Mako - give the Harvesters some more ships. Leave the Shire alone for now.


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - jammi - 08-25-2009

I prefer this new model. Will it have a fix for the annoying problems where it's disrupted by NPCs with Hornets and Wasps?


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - dr lameos - 08-25-2009

It doesn't look so big and imposing and I can't see where all the turrets would go. On the current model the pods are enclosed, and armoured in a way, I believe you said that in its design notes.

Whilst this model is nice, it looks a bit train-ish, rather than sturdy, scarey container transport. Personally I'm a fan of the current model.


Shire ... third ( or forth? ) revision - Birdtalon - 08-25-2009

Yet another brilliant ship. Would get this for sure:D