![]() |
|
Hogosha bomber proposal - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183) +---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389) +----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +----- Thread: Hogosha bomber proposal (/showthread.php?tid=32297) |
Hogosha bomber proposal - Zukeenee - 01-05-2010 A nice idea for a bomber, but like the others have said, I don't see this as being a Hogosha ship. Makes me think that we'd get another surge in Hogosha indies, SNACing the hell out of any transports that still bring ore up to Narita. Also, gun-less and turret-less sounds pretty cool. Although it might be interesting to give it just one gun slot or one turret slot. I don't know, I just think that would be neat, too. Hogosha bomber proposal - Ceoran - 01-05-2010 /signed Doesn't fit the Hogosha. And being the slowest turning ship around I doubt it would fit any Kusari shipline at all. Besides the only factions a superbomber like this would fit in would be the militaries, or criminals who are already designed for having bulky ships. But then again those latter ones already have their superbomber, right? Hogosha bomber proposal - tansytansey - 01-05-2010 ' Wrote:[i]Built by the Hogosha to combat the growing number of Outcast and Crysanthemum capital vessels,I found a fatal flaw in your concept. #1 There are no Outcasts in Kusari. #2 Golden Chrysanthemums have no Capital ships. As for the dual SNAC concept. Good luck with that, but I have a feeling the weather forecast for your crazy parade isn't looking very good. Hogosha bomber proposal - Zukeenee - 01-06-2010 ' Wrote:There are no Outcasts in Kusari. Tell that to the Tridentes we get all the time in Kyushu. Kusari seems to be a small part of the cardi smuggling route, and certain groups of Outcasts have taken that as an invitation to bring their gunships as far as New Tokyo at times. No, we have our Outcasts. But I suppose the point doesn't matter here, since general opinion is that the Hogosha don't need this bomber, and the infocard will likely be rewritten anyway. Hogosha bomber proposal - Colonel.Tigh - 01-06-2010 Hogosha Bomber yes, superbomber no. Just make it more or less a clone of the GC bomber, fast enough, but larger than the other kusari bombers, and a bit weaker than the KNF one. in the mean time i am happy with my FA Mama. Hogosha bomber proposal - aerelm - 01-06-2010 Make it a Corsair Uber-Bomber:P Afterall, Corsairs have best ships in Sirius (InRP) So a new Ship technology is a good idea to get closer to this fact. I think 1 backward firing turret, 2 Torp, 1 CD slot is a good idea to wtfpwn some lolcast caps (and also lolcast non-caps:D) Hogosha bomber proposal - Corsair - 01-06-2010 Finished a sketch. Will scan in tomorrow. The Hogosha are closely allied with the Corsairs. While I agree that Hogosha was a silly idea, it's too good a sketch to waste.:P The sketch makes the thing itself look like a torpedo. While superbombers are bad, I retain my decision to make it one. But slightly modified- give it Barghest maneuverability and core- slightly higher power regen, because I'm thinking about donating this one to the Consortium. Hogosha bomber proposal - Prysin - 01-06-2010 ' Wrote:Honestly, Akura, what isn't abused? relax.... if you really want you can kill fighters with jsut snac and nova..... adding 2 snac's is just EPIC DO WANT Hogosha bomber proposal - Corsair - 01-08-2010 The sketch is here. I'm rather proud of the result. Look, judge, and decide.
Hogosha bomber proposal - Zukeenee - 01-08-2010 Tube w/ fins. So... which way's up? |