![]() |
|
System size - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: System size (/showthread.php?tid=64125) |
System size - Vladimir - 08-02-2011 Don't die? And it's not like you should just change character and stay in same system after you die. System size - BertieNash - 08-02-2011 ' Wrote:Big is good for huge open space battles involving massive capship fleets. See LNS vs RNC. A skilled pirate bomber can take down pretty much any transport that is in the middle of nowhere with a gunboat on his tail System size - Vladimir - 08-02-2011 How about repair ship on his tail, then? Or fighter escort? Or escort that warns about incoming pirates and/or engages them buying time for miner? Seriously. However, yes, i also find it bad that fights in disco last that long, and killing fleeing target is that hard. Remove armor, remove nanobots, grr. System size - SnakThree - 08-02-2011 So are you looking for opinion or are you trying to force your opinion on others? System size - Vladimir - 08-02-2011 Your opinion is not a holy cow not to be touched. I'm looking for opinions in poll, here i'm looking for explanations for opinions and arguments. If somebody manages to "force" his opinion on the other, it means his opinion is right, while the other's one is wrong. System size - Gaz83 - 08-02-2011 ' Wrote:Less systems that are bigger with more things in, is better than more systems. System size - Coin - 08-02-2011 the big systems should have more tradelanes in them, and the size of the planets, suns, bases, etc could be scaled up for realism. make the systems big, but make the planets correspondingly massive too System size - Jihadjoe - 08-02-2011 ' Wrote:Less systems that are bigger with more things in, is better than more systems. Fewer, not less. Also, I would like to see the entirity of some whole houses combined into a single enourmous system. Do away with system chat entirely, but make local chat far longer range. System size - r3vange - 08-02-2011 [color=#FFFFFF]I was wondering can systems be made with 7 or 8 planets in circular orbits with circular asteroid fields in-between? I mean obviously the planets won't orbit the sun but at least they can be situated in the orbital planes. Example California. Cali minor is actually close ingame to the sun than LA but it is freezing if we do the standart system model we can put cally way back say the outer system while LA will be in the habitable zone System size - Knjaz - 08-02-2011 ' Wrote:Big is good for huge open space battles involving massive capship fleets. See LNS vs RNC. Aside from the comment about bomber vs miner with escort by BertieNash, don't compare IMGs potential with everybody else. I've seen how you guys were working, and I should say faction with 40 day activity is more of an exception here, then norm. ^^ It's very hard to find an escort, it's even harder to find escort that will kill bomber before you'll get killed. And again, even harder if you're in a timezone with server population barely going above 80. In a system where pirate can approach from different sides, scout isn't that useful. Only way to go is to mine on the edge of the field, but that's also not always possible. As for the topic - I'd vote No. We're already going to have more systems then maximum allowed number of players on the server (so I heard), it'd be insane to make these systems even bigger. |