Discovery Gaming Community
New anglia/cambria - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: New anglia/cambria (/showthread.php?tid=87668)

Pages: 1 2 3 4


New anglia/cambria - Ichiru - 09-17-2012

' Wrote:and all guard systems.

Because the faction leaders who paid for their Guard systems and put so much work into them should have it taken away just because Govedo says so.


New anglia/cambria - SummerMcLovin - 09-17-2012

AD has already stated that removing systems can cause problems; they've been left in for that reason I believe.


New anglia/cambria - Alley - 09-18-2012

It'd be logical that it brings bugs, maybe related to player ships due to exploration of the systems and charting data but considering nobody had access to NA/NC on the discovery server (aside of admins maybe?) I doubt it would have a massive impact.


New anglia/cambria - Hone - 09-18-2012

' Wrote:Well nothing interesting in general, better to get them out of the mod together with 10 other such useless systems and all guard systems.


Sing it preacher!



' Wrote:Because the faction leaders who paid for their Guard systems and put so much work into them should have it taken away just because Govedo says so.

They can have a guard base in their regular systems if they really need something. But Paying for something permanent, when the factions come and go, is just silly.


New anglia/cambria - SnakThree - 09-18-2012

' Wrote:Because the faction leaders who paid for their Guard systems and put so much work into them should have it taken away just because Govedo says so.
Yeah. These things happen. Like losing your favourite toy from childhood.

Look at LN and LSF. Alaska is the perfect place for their guard station complex.

But instead we have 2 systems that are visited rarely except to get proper equipment.

Lane Hackers have their guard station in Alberta.

Do you believe that unguarded guard system entrances via using jumphole visible by public makes sense?

I personally don't. I have already posted a thread about guard station complexes in public systems. And there were more people than only Govedo13 showing support for the idea.

So before you post ignorant comment, do get acquainted with possible options.


New anglia/cambria - Daedric - 09-18-2012

Guard Systems?

Burn them. With fire.

@ topic

What Jammi said. Few peeps got to see them on this server before Cannon implemented the KREIG ON JUMP INTO NA/NC feature. :P


New anglia/cambria - farmerman - 09-18-2012

Making guard systems useful should be the first approach, if you ask me. And I do believe in some cases they are. Yay to that!

Maybe New Anglia and Cambria could be used for something? Both seem like nice names, could use them for unnecessarily numbered systems (though Bretonia doesn't seem to have many of those anyway).


New anglia/cambria - Flashâ„¢ - 09-18-2012

New Anglia sounds like GRN Guard System in my opinion.


New anglia/cambria - Friday - 09-18-2012

All official factions have the option of handing back their guard systems, to be integrated into the mod. Many factions have already taken up this opportunity.

Some former guard systems only need a little spit and polish, some need major rework, others have pretty much nothing in them anyway, and a few seem to operate in a parallel universe - where all their dreams and aspirations are fulfilled through magic and ponies.



New anglia/cambria - AeternusDoleo - 09-18-2012

' Wrote:Whats up with these systems?when will they be unclosed?i want to check them out
They will be physically deleted from 4.87 (already are gone in the development version). These systems were never finished nor connected to the mod, so there's no reason to leave them in. Poole will be brought into the mod as a nonguard Bretonian system.