+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Communication Channel (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=59)
+--- Thread: To: Republic of Liberty Subject: Pending Lawsuit WITHDRAWN (/showthread.php?tid=99474)
Pages:
1
2
RE: To: Republic of Liberty Subject: Pending Lawsuit WITHDRAWN - Slappy - 05-31-2013
:: INCOMING TRANSMISSION :::
From: Bobby Lee Cook, Esq.
Location: Alston + Spalding, LLP | Planet Manhatten
To: The Honorable Reynold Stark | Justices of the Surpreme Court of the Republic
Subject: Concerns
Encrypted: Low
Priority: High
Location: Alston + Spalding, LLP | Planet Manhatten
To: The Honorable Reynold Stark | Justices of the Surpreme Court of the Republic
Subject: Concerns
Encrypted: Low
Priority: High
To the Honorable Reynold Stark and the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the Republic,
As most of our attention to this communications channel has been based on increasing our presence in the legal market and properly representing those whose rights must be vindicated, I must protest this action.
Never before has the Court unilaterally fined and disbarred an attorney without notice and hearing, let alone for a substantial amount based neither on damages nor a scintilla of proof of conduct. As the Court is well aware, the cogs of justice turn on having each party PROVE his or her claim. Admittedly, disciplinary proceedings are less formal than a pure trial, but the defendant, as determined by the precedents of this Court itself, is entitled to the same presumption of innocence and given an opportunity to be heard on the change against him.[/php]
These actions, if allowed to stand, do a grave injustice to the Court's standing and chill the legal profession in a way that cannot be underestimated. I implore you to reconsider your actions, for they reflect poorly on all who consider themselves representatives of the law in our fair Republic. I will more than happily represent Mr. Platte's interest, and I request appointment by the Court to do so.
Truly yours,
Bobby Lee Cook, Esq.
Alston + Spalding, LLP
A Sirius-Wide Limited Liability Partnership
**The materials in this communication are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. These materials are intended, but not promised or guaranteed to be current, complete, or up-to-date and should in no way be taken as an indication of future results. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, and the receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Any newsletters and articles associated with this communication are offered only for general informational and educational purposes. They are not offered as and do not constitute legal advice or legal opinions. You should not act or rely on any information contained in this communication without first seeking the advice of an attorney.
If you contact us in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The transmission of an request for information does not create an attorney-client relationship and you should not send us any information or facts relating to your legal problem or question. If you are a client, remember that email may not be secure. There is a risk that your communication may be intercepted illegally. There may also be a risk of waiver of attorney-client privilege and/or work product privileges that may attach to your communication.
In some jurisdictions, portions of this communication may be considered advertising. The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, and should not be based solely upon written information about our qualifications and experience. Alston + Spalding has endeavored to comply with legal and ethical requirements in compiling this website. Alston + Spalding does not desire to represent clients based upon their review of any portions of this website that do not comply with legal or ethical requirements.**
If you contact us in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The transmission of an request for information does not create an attorney-client relationship and you should not send us any information or facts relating to your legal problem or question. If you are a client, remember that email may not be secure. There is a risk that your communication may be intercepted illegally. There may also be a risk of waiver of attorney-client privilege and/or work product privileges that may attach to your communication.
In some jurisdictions, portions of this communication may be considered advertising. The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, and should not be based solely upon written information about our qualifications and experience. Alston + Spalding has endeavored to comply with legal and ethical requirements in compiling this website. Alston + Spalding does not desire to represent clients based upon their review of any portions of this website that do not comply with legal or ethical requirements.**