+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Discovery Mod Balance (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=31)
+---- Thread: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? (/showthread.php?tid=120885)
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - Jayce - 04-04-2015
well i mean it's not balanced in terms of numbers, but its not that big of a deal
like, a nerf is in order, but idc that much because im a dank meme meister and trash salvagers every day anyway
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - SnakThree - 04-04-2015
Let's wait till Congressmen jump in and prove us wrong about Salvager being hardest ship to pirate even with the reputation sheet as good as Junkers.
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - Hawk - 04-04-2015
(04-04-2015, 12:55 AM)Carter Wrote: Hawk please, Countless XA? The only time i've seen "countless" XA in space was a few months ago, ever since then things went quiet, your argument is invalid.
So my argument is invalid because you haven't seen many XA in a while? Where is the logic in that? I was one of the first people on this server to buy a salvager and I've been flying the same one for the last six years. I've seen plenty of them wrecked by XA.
I'll give you one thing though. Haste, the salvager does need a nerf. Its cargo capacity should have been nerfed a long time ago. I've never felt the salvager was a practical trade ship anyway. There are higher capacity ships that make me a lot more money and I'm good and not ending up in people's gun sights anyway so it's going to be the same to me with or without the regens. In fact I think I'm going to start flying mine without the regens just for the fun of it.
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - Impyness - 04-04-2015
Quite frankly, I personally dont see the issue with the Salvager. It's more survivable than battletransports, but looking at the actual cost it costs the exact same at 100 million while having 1000 less cargo. As a survivable transport with less cargo, I believe it's balanced in terms of price vs defence and cargo. If you're arguing that it's more survivable and has more cargo than a pirate transport, then shouldnt we buff or nerf all transports to have the exact same comparable stats without factoring in price? Also keep in mind unlike all other small transports and some liners the ship doesnt actually have a CD either.
The main issue I have with the Salvager is that I dont think it should be able to actually mine things while having that level of cargo and survivability. So personally I'd like to see either its mining ability removed, which I think would act as a balance fix but not fit the lore or for its cargo to be reduced down to the 2900 level.
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - Jayce - 04-04-2015
(04-04-2015, 03:15 AM)Hawk Wrote:(04-04-2015, 12:55 AM)Carter Wrote: Hawk please, Countless XA? The only time i've seen "countless" XA in space was a few months ago, ever since then things went quiet, your argument is invalid.
So my argument is invalid because you haven't seen many XA in a while? Where is the logic in that? I was one of the first people on this server to buy a salvager and I've been flying the same one for the last six years. I've seen plenty of them wrecked by XA.
I'll give you one thing though. Haste, the salvager does need a nerf. Its cargo capacity should have been nerfed a long time ago. I've never felt the salvager was a practical trade ship anyway. There are higher capacity ships that make me a lot more money and I'm good and not ending up in people's gun sights anyway so it's going to be the same to me with or without the regens. In fact I think I'm going to start flying mine without the regens just for the fun of it.
I'm going to need an ingame name for this regenless Salvager.
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - Swifty - 04-04-2015
(04-04-2015, 03:15 AM)Hawk Wrote:Cool story bro, wanna hear mine? I was talking in general, aka .88, i didn't go back 6 years ago, those times are long gone and they should just no be mentioned ever again, keep in mind that grave digging is bad.(04-04-2015, 12:55 AM)Carter Wrote: Hawk please, Countless XA? The only time i've seen "countless" XA in space was a few months ago, ever since then things went quiet, your argument is invalid.
So my argument is invalid because you haven't seen many XA in a while? Where is the logic in that? I was one of the first people on this server to buy a salvager and I've been flying the same one for the last six years. I've seen plenty of them wrecked by XA.
(04-04-2015, 03:15 AM)Hawk Wrote: There are higher capacity ships that make me a lot more money and I'm good and not ending up in people's gun sights anyway so it's going to be the same to me with or without the regens. In fact I think I'm going to start flying mine without the regens just for the fun of it.
Challange accepted, but don't ban/beam me if things go off hand.
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - SnakeLancerHaven - 04-04-2015
(04-03-2015, 06:55 PM)Hidamari Wrote: but its a frigate lyth remember, since when are frigates trade ships?
+1
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - Lythrilux - 04-04-2015
(04-04-2015, 09:38 AM)Snake Wrote:He was being sarcastic and making fun of your point about frigates, fyi.(04-03-2015, 06:55 PM)Hidamari Wrote: but its a frigate lyth remember, since when are frigates trade ships?
+1
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - Hawk - 04-04-2015
(04-04-2015, 04:16 AM)Jayce Wrote: I'm going to need an ingame name for this regenless Salvager.
It's currently named "Tallwood" as is going to stay that way for a while. Let's see if you can do better with it than the others.
RE: Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high? - Jayce - 04-05-2015
(04-04-2015, 05:47 PM)Hawk Wrote:(04-04-2015, 04:16 AM)Jayce Wrote: I'm going to need an ingame name for this regenless Salvager.
It's currently named "Tallwood" as is going to stay that way for a while. Let's see if you can do better with it than the others.
I would if you'd log it on.