+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Edge Worlds (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=72)
+----- Forum: Sirius Coalition (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=461)
+----- Thread: SCRA Faction Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=11007)
SCRA Faction Feedback - Zelot - 08-20-2010
' Wrote:Yes, and I'm saying that it used to involve the recruit going up and entering his name into a transponder, and not into the ship's hull itself.
Learn 2 be polite noob/Jameson
Play nice -DL.
Hey guys, Zelot here, just reminding you to keep on target in faction feedback threads. That target being responding to the faction itself in regards to its conduct in game/whining if they beat you in a fight and so on. If you're not a member of that faction it's generally considered poor form to respond on their behalf, or respond to another person questioning them. It's not a discussion thread.
Kthx!
<strike>Dusty</strike> Zelot out.
SCRA Faction Feedback - Dennis Jameson - 08-20-2010
Eh, it was a joke. :P Stop taking things so seriously, and \ or fishing for things to complain about.
SCRA Faction Feedback - Kazinsal - 08-23-2010
Always fun to RP with the Coalition's high up in-game over PM or system or whatever else have you.
To quote the words of many an eBayer: "A+++++++"
SCRA Faction Feedback - Akura - 08-23-2010
Reading through the Roleplay behind the Havana blowing up some, I really liked how you followed up your ingame mistakes with roleplay concequences.
Kudos for that.
SCRA Faction Feedback - arvg - 08-23-2010
Thanks, it is something a number of SCRA High Command believe in.
We fight on our own terms, but some times we get caught. And if we get caught, then there needs to be consequences to it.
Also I stand behind the fact that it was a beautiful trap the KNF forces laid down. There has to be some RP reward to that.
SCRA Faction Feedback - Montezuma/Kukulcan - 08-27-2010
Ok, while I've had some really nice interactions with your people in-game (I mean it, every time I have met a SCRA ship for as long as I can remember, it has been a good encounter), I have just had a look at your message dump, and the last few posts I read contained about the biggest amount of metagaming I have ever seen. Let me quote one of your message dump posts to illustrate my point; "Your tactical Commanders have a plan for dealing with the BHG that are amassing to strike our beloved motherland", now, as nothing of the sort has happened in-game yet, I would love to know your explanation for this, seeing as the only talk of it has been via Skype and over an encrypted Comm Channel thread.
Please, do explain how you would, in-RP have any idea that something of this sort is happening, because this strikes me as nothing but metagaming.
SCRA Faction Feedback - HurricaneX - 08-27-2010
' Wrote:Ok, while I've had some really nice interactions with your people in-game, I have just had a look at your message dump, and the last few posts I read contained about the biggest amount of metagaming I have ever seen. Let me quote one of your message dump posts to illustrate my point; "Your tactical Commanders have a plan for dealing with the BHG that are amassing to strike our beloved motherland", now, as nothing of the sort has happened in-game yet, I would love to know your explanation for this, seeing as the only talk of it has been via Skype and over an encrypted Comm Channel thread.This, comrade.
Please, do explain how you would, in-RP have any idea that something of this sort is happening, because this strikes me as nothing but metagaming.
SCRA Faction Feedback - Waratah - 08-27-2010
' Wrote:Ok, while I've had some really nice interactions with your people in-game, I have just had a look at your message dump, and the last few posts I read contained about the biggest amount of metagaming I have ever seen. Let me quote one of your message dump posts to illustrate my point; "Your tactical Commanders have a plan for dealing with the BHG that are amassing to strike our beloved motherland", now, as nothing of the sort has happened in-game yet, I would love to know your explanation for this, seeing as the only talk of it has been via Skype and over an encrypted Comm Channel thread.
Please, do explain how you would, in-RP have any idea that something of this sort is happening, because this strikes me as nothing but metagaming.
Maybe there is a leak or spy in the BHG, there could be loads of reasons for this.
SCRA Faction Feedback - Dashiell - 08-27-2010
I agree with Monty here. I`ve -never- seen any lousy SCRA performance ingame.
but right now on the forums, thats's quite another story
The part where you people know -exactly- what ships are supposed to attack is quite 'raises eyebrows' to me.
And please don't come with that 'we have leet spais, we know all' stuff. that's like flying around in a [LN] Legate saying 'I stole it when its crew was on the loo' (that rhymes, pretty awesome stuff there)
a post that specifically says 'spam bombers' when you have no idea, in rp, that the bhg would even attack, let alone in what kind of ships is utter and triue metagaming.
'tis not cool folks.
SCRA Faction Feedback - aerelm - 08-27-2010
' Wrote:Maybe there is a leak or spy in the BHG, there could be loads of reasons for this.If SCRA wants to have a Spy in The Core, or any of those 'loads of reasons', They'll have to RP it out beforehand, so that 'Spy' exists In an RP Sense... When there is no record of that Spy, anywhere, even the High-Encrypted Records of SCRA... This means I can have a Spy in any and all factions of Serious just by reading their Message Dumps and Comm Channel Threads and find out about everything they might do because of, well... "Spies Everywhere!"