![]() |
|
Brotherhood Feedback - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60) +---- Forum: Edge Worlds (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=72) +----- Forum: [TBH] (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=78) +----- Thread: Brotherhood Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=10942) |
RE: Brotherhood Feedback - Thunderer - 02-05-2016 I am going to wait for the official response then, because personal ones tend to be subjective. RE: Brotherhood Feedback - Clavius - 02-06-2016 After carefully reading all three interpretations about the events mentioned, I came to the conclusion that involving parties, in general, should be pleased with the battles that happen. Therefor, I suggest that our future events should be planned more carefully so that the events end well for both sides, regardless of the winner. RE: Brotherhood Feedback - Thunderer - 02-06-2016 I agree about that. I have an idea: if there are more events in the future, they should either be cap only, or snub only. It is apparently harmful for people's gluteus maximusses to mix them. Furthermore: (02-05-2016, 07:21 AM)Vito Wrote: You (bretonian BS) and a bretonian carrier come to Omega 5 (which is just wrong for a BAF tagged battleship, if you ask me) This member of the TBH apparently doesn't like BAF raids of Omega-5. The TBH and the BAF have had some nice RP in order to enable those and, until a few days ago, all were fun for both sides. I'd never end the (supposedly) fun raids just because of one bloke, but maybe the TBH share Vito's opinion, and want the BAF to stop raiding Omega-5? Just say if you chaps do, I only know a couple of easier things. RE: Brotherhood Feedback - Vito - 02-06-2016 I left TBH last night so my opinion is not relevant anymore. Have fun out there RE: Brotherhood Feedback - DragonLancer - 02-08-2016 BAF has no reason to be in Omega-5. If you want an event, we have a subforum for this. All I can see is that TBH lost its virtual cojones. RE: Brotherhood Feedback - DragonLancer - 02-08-2016 I'm leaving but no rage quit or such. I need to make a decision with the focus that this account was perma-banned in the past. Jack got the cojones to lead TBH but he's a miner. RE: Brotherhood Feedback - Wesker - 02-09-2016 (02-08-2016, 08:34 AM)DragonLancer Wrote: BAF has no reason to be in Omega-5. RP was done by BAF for the discovery for both omega-5 and cadiz by thunderer and Pepe. You came to Cambridge, we assumed you were raiding and got bored since no one was there so we visited omega-5. Idk why the other TBH docked but even after that I told the other snub to stay out as I entered the duel with you. For future refrence if you don't want pvp just pm the person pls. Sorry the encounter was bad. -BAF|Nicole RE: Brotherhood Feedback - Jack_Henderson - 02-09-2016 Really nothing to be sorry about. A real TBH would not just dock and log off because of something that minor. Pouting and making a rage thread, then leaving all channels and quitting the faction is not Corsairish, neither ingame-ly, nor oorply. Let's turn a page. Most players that were mentioned in the problems here have left the faction. I hope TBH can go back to being a fun faction to play and one to play with. RE: Brotherhood Feedback - Wesker - 02-09-2016 (02-09-2016, 04:28 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Really nothing to be sorry about. You need Pepe back RE: Brotherhood Feedback - nOmnomnOm - 02-09-2016 (02-09-2016, 03:35 PM)Wesker Wrote: For future refrence if you don't want pvp just pm the person pls. Sorry the encounter was bad. Do people even listen if someone doesnt want PvP? |