![]() |
|
Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Ending the Capship Issue(and more) (/showthread.php?tid=9215) |
Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - Akumabito - 06-11-2008 ' Wrote:...this is exactly what the 101st does? Direct them to the registration thread? We don't blow them up until they've decided to be arses, you know... It's the threat of "register or be pvp whored" that makes an arse, not refusing to listen to one. Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - killhappyfool - 06-11-2008 GET THE HELL OFF MY THREAD. There is one I just put up for you to argue all you want over the Faction Rule. YES they have a right to request you to register. HOWEVER they MUST be polite in the manner in which they ask you. Registering DOES not mean you HAVE to join the faction. If you want RP a sub group of the NPC Faction then go for it. I am going to be with a few of my characters cause they wouldn't fit properly in the actual groups. Now please I ask get onto the topic of the thread. As a side note the post was not meant as an attack on any single faction. I don't necessarily agree with what the 101st has done in terms of Caps but that is their prerogative as the paying owners of those systems. Thanks //sorry for all the anger I am really mad to see my Thread Hijacked for such a (what I feel is) Bullhonky reason. However I don't find any solution in blaming any single person just working to get it back on topic. So please if you don't know what the topic is refer to my first page. IF someone could link to Del's post about the links and stuff he made that would be like uberly awesome.// **Edited. Ehh heh heh sorry del just fixed that >.> <.< no one saw that ^.^** Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - JovialKnight - 06-11-2008 Is this what you mean? http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?s=...st&p=269988 Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - Ors - 06-11-2008 ' Wrote://sorry for all the anger I am really mad to see my Thread Hijacked for such a (what I feel is) Bullhonky reason. However I don't find any solution in blaming any single person just working to get it back on topic. So please if you don't know what the topic is refer to my first page. IF someone could link to Del's post about the links and stuff she made that would be like uberly awesome.// just one thing.... Del is a guy mate. Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - n00bl3t - 06-12-2008 ' Wrote:As an Outcast I can say that a very very high percentage of outcasts regard the Outcast factions as the law in Outcast space and that they have a form of governance over the other Outcasts. I'm an OC. Story's in my sig. Akumabito is referring to the HMS Churchhill I believe. We have? I have. I own my ship. You are not going to order my ship to do work which your own soldiers can do. I hope that the way I have inferred this is different to your intended meaning. ' Wrote:The Outcast Destroyer is constructed at Corsica. The Shipyards in Londonderry should not be producing that vessel, and it should be removed next version. Malta is not capable of launching capital ships (other than Gunboats) into planetary orbit. There is no way something that large could survive the stress of launch and re-entry. My craft and how it was contructed addresses this problem. When I complete it you are quite welcome to read. Edit: ' Wrote:Hahahaha. Did you screenshot it and sanction the person? ' Wrote:You'll find that most of the discussion here has been reasonable, with the exception of one induvidual trying to derail the whole thing. I have added said induvidual to my ignored list. It was bought while I was still working on the RP for it. In terms of RP it's been around since 812AS-813AS, it still needs a lot of work but I don't have the time right now. The RP is in my sig. ' Wrote:Well if thats the case about n00blets ship then I will see what I can do. Do what? Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - AdamantineFist - 06-12-2008 ' Wrote:I You are not going to order my ship to do work which your own soldiers can do.At no point does he ask you to do any work for the 101st. All he asked is that you spend a mkinute to TELL US what your ship is. It's in-RP. Think of it as a notice that was distributed to the Naval high command when your ship was commissioned. That's all it is. ' Wrote:I hope that the way I have inferred this is different to your intended meaning.You hope you misunderstood him? What? What is that supposed to mean? Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - Eppy - 06-12-2008 Very nice. A completely automated warship. The temptation to debate the legitimacy of that concept is exceptional, to say the least, but I'll refrain, simply because there isn't enough data to properly rule it out; just inferences. All the same: The 101st considers itself in overall command of the Outcast military, and it considers any and all Outcast-based warships under its watch. Why on earth you can't take the necessary thirty seconds to make the post I don't know, but it isn't really my problem; Direct Force Theory is in full swing at the moment. Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - n00bl3t - 06-12-2008 ' Wrote:Hah! One of the best voices of reason on this thread, and he's barely been here any time at all! Good attitude, Fang. Co-operate? What aspect of co-operation is take orders from Grand Admiral Mia? It's not. That's why I didn't join any other clan. Also, I'm quite sure after this argument my RP has been noticed. I also saw Eppy reading my Destroyer RP about 5 minutes ago. And currently Del is reading it. ' Wrote: Nice typos. Edit: ' Wrote:At no point does he ask you to do any work for the 101st. All he asked is that you spend a mkinute to TELL US what your ship is. It's in-RP. Think of it as a notice that was distributed to the Naval high command when your ship was commissioned. That's all it is. Apologies, but that's what it sounded like. I hope that I did not interpret it correctly. Because if I had to take orders from Eppy, that would really suck. Sorry Eppy, I don't want... ' Wrote:Very nice. A completely automated warship. The temptation to debate the legitimacy of that concept is exceptional, to say the least, but I'll refrain, simply because there isn't enough data to properly rule it out; just inferences. All the same: The 101st considers itself in overall command of the Outcast military, and it considers any and all Outcast-based warships under its watch. Why on earth you can't take the necessary thirty seconds to make the post I don't know, but it isn't really my problem; Direct Force Theory is in full swing at the moment. Debate all you want. I'm willing to answer any questions you have regarding this. Preferably PM. Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - Akumabito - 06-12-2008 ' Wrote:Why on earth you can't take the necessary thirty seconds to make the post I don't know Why on earth you can't limit this to ships that you actually see acting oorp I don't know. But you're neither my faction leader or someone who I respect enough to do what he demands, so go ahead and try to pvp whore me. Ending the Capship Issue(and more) - AdamantineFist - 06-12-2008 ' Wrote:Apologies, but that's what it sounded like. Ok, good thing we have that misunderstanding behind us.... at least, I hope it was a misunderstanding. Are you now willing to "register" your ship? I see it as more of a notification that it was commissioned. It's not really much. |