+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Server Events (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=411)
+---- Forum: Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=28)
+---- Thread: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. (/showthread.php?tid=103901)
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - sindroms - 08-27-2013
Updated the first post with Q&A.
Start spreading this through chats, the more people we get, the more of a chance the admins giving this a green light.
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - Sabru - 08-27-2013
withdrawn
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - Venture - 08-27-2013
I'am sure most of =LSF= will be there,including me
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - Stolt. - 08-27-2013
We actually had events like this during the transition from 4.85 to 4.86. But back then a entirely new server was created where the PVP rules were relaxed, people could respawn etc. It was for the Battle of Omicron Minor and Battle of the Taus events. There were also commands where we were able to spawn whatever ship we wanted without having to spend a dime, whether it was a fighter or a battleship.
Anyways this basically sounds like the same idea again (without the spawning whatever ship we want without a cost
)but I think it would be better to have this event in New Hampshire/Bremen since that's where the war is actually being fought inRP. But one concern I have is the server crashing. Assuming this even goes ahead, its likely the server may keep crashing if too many people participate. But other that it sounds like a good idea.
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - Caconym - 08-27-2013
I have the same concern. A server crash will probably occur, since just a pew between a few BSs in NY a little while ago caused a server crash. Good idea, but... I'm not sure if its gonna work, sadly.
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - KaiserDietz - 08-28-2013
I love this idea. Have we got a green light from the admins?
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - Hone - 08-29-2013
(08-26-2013, 08:36 PM)sindroms Wrote: You know what?
I suck at PVP. I really do.
When it is one on one, I really feel bad dying, because I know that the other person probably had little to no challenge to take me out. When it is in a group fight, however, things are even worse, because I always manage to die early on during raids and people from the group are all like
://oh goddamnit Spaz :c
://Seriously?
:*Facepalm*
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - sindroms - 08-29-2013
People jousting razorboats does not make me a good PvPer.
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - belarusich - 08-29-2013
Worth to log and play. Though reminds me Lobster's event where turtle pwned all because of their cloaks/no required skill to fly.
That time it can be alot of RMCs.
Which are countered only by alot of LABCs, which wont be here...
RE: The "No-Reengagement-Rule" LN-RM event. - sindroms - 08-29-2013
How about we worry about when and if that happens instead of doing so prematurely.