![]() |
|
Bulldog Replacement - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183) +---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389) +----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +----- Thread: Bulldog Replacement (/showthread.php?tid=112841) |
RE: Bulldog Replacement - Flashâ„¢ - 03-06-2014 (03-06-2014, 08:47 AM)sindroms Wrote: Make that bigger and we have a Bulldog Bomber. EDIT: eaning Junkers should get the new Bulldog, what Lyth said, turning it into a Light VHF. And giving Junkers a Bomber which looks like the Bulldog? Would be nice, the collector is useless. RE: Bulldog Replacement - Haste - 03-06-2014 (03-06-2014, 03:26 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: So I had a thought: Those stats are basically a better version of the current Loki and such. You're more likely to get a 2 class 9, 2 class 8 version with those stats (just like all the other CD+Torp HFs with a Class 10 Shield). (03-06-2014, 03:36 PM)Tal Wrote: Junkers already have a VHF (albeit a bad one). Wat. The Collector is a solid ship, and "Templar clone" describes it rather well as-is. As for the model: the textures aren't very Junker-like in my book, and it'd look a little out of place in the line. Just like the Bulldog does right now, I suppose. A bit more yellow and gray, plus a healthy dose of visual wear&tear could fix that. Other than that, looks neat. And most definitely PvP-capable. RE: Bulldog Replacement - nOmnomnOm - 03-06-2014 Make it even more Junker-like maybe by replacing the blue with yellow? RE: Bulldog Replacement - Lythrilux - 03-06-2014 (03-06-2014, 04:46 PM)Haste Wrote:(03-06-2014, 03:26 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: So I had a thought:Alright, how about the powercore stays at 9,000 then? Alright, how about the powercore stays at 9,000 then? RE: Bulldog Replacement - Haste - 03-06-2014 I'm not a balance dev. I'm just stating that if you look at the existing ships of the kind you're suggesting (Heavy Fighter, CD+Torp, VHF plant and VHF shield), you should expect a 4-gunner and not a 6-gunner. I also doubt that a power plant size drop will be considered a proper 'compensation' for two(!) more (high-class) guns. A six-gunner with a cd and torp and a shape as thin as the Bulldog would be, potentially, incredibly powerful. Possibly too powerful. Anyways, if you genuinely want to discuss stats with someone who can give you helpful replies, I'd hit up Aerelm. RE: Bulldog Replacement - Caelumaresh - 03-06-2014 (03-06-2014, 08:25 AM)Scout Wrote: Epic, gimmedat
RE: Bulldog Replacement - Durandal - 06-20-2016 I'll just leave this here.
RE: Bulldog Replacement - Gulryz - 06-20-2016 so we are getting it ? RE: Bulldog Replacement - sindroms - 06-20-2016 But..where is the space-camo? RE: Bulldog Replacement - Durandal - 06-20-2016 (06-20-2016, 07:05 AM)Gulryz Wrote: so we are getting it ? That is generally what happens when you see devs posting models in .cmp format. |