![]() |
|
Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement (/showthread.php?tid=113069) |
RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Hawk - 03-11-2014 That's a shame. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - kikatsu - 03-11-2014 Why not have both? RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Moberg - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 02:52 PM)kikatsu Wrote: Why not have both? Both factions have interesting concepts. I imagine merging their tech usage somehow (background adjustment or something?) could lead to a lot of fun and possibilities. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Enkidu - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 02:46 PM)Garrett Jax Wrote: My job here is to serve the community, not try and shoehorn in an idea that the community clearly does not want, or push aside a concept that they would like better. That's possibly the most noble thing I've ever seen anybody do in any gaming community, ever. Huge Kudos, Garret. ![]()
RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Hawk - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 02:59 PM)Achille You're right. It's a shame we don't see more of that. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Treewyrm - 03-11-2014 Voted none. Neither variants, despite having provided feedback and ideas to two of them, are related to anything phantoms where. If someone wants etherium, revenants or whatever else - make your own bloody game assets, don't be vultures who smelled rotten corpse of a long dead faction to make a feast out of it. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Rodent - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 02:46 PM)Garrett Jax Wrote: My job here is to serve the community, not try and shoehorn in an idea that the community clearly does not want, or push aside a concept that they would like better. You've earned respect points. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Backo - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 03:02 PM)Treewyrm Wrote: Voted none. Neither variants, despite having provided feedback and ideas to two of them, are related to anything phantoms where. If someone wants etherium, revenants or whatever else - make your own bloody game assets, don't be vultures who smelled rotten corpse of a long dead faction to make a feast out of it. So what you're saying is the models, assets, etc should stay in the game just to clog up some extra hard disk space and never be used, because the faction that once used them has been disbanded? The Phantoms have come and gone, the assets they used (which in my opinion weren't even that pretty to now's standards) are left on the mod with no use at all, why shouldn't they be recycled if the admins haven't deleted them in all this time? P.S. Don't forget that before they were phantom toys they were the Lane Hacker LF and LSF VHF. Oh and Corsair Cruiser. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Stefz - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 02:46 PM)Garrett Jax Wrote: My job here is to serve the community, not try and shoehorn in an idea that the community clearly does not want, or push aside a concept that they would like better. Wow. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Unlucky_Soul - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 02:46 PM)Garrett Jax Wrote: My job here is to serve the community, not try and shoehorn in an idea that the community clearly does not want, or push aside a concept that they would like better. Takes Character to say what you actually said. You have my respect Garrett Jax. |