![]() |
|
The "Carrier" of a new Era - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Server Events (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=411) +---- Forum: Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=28) +---- Thread: The "Carrier" of a new Era (/showthread.php?tid=116722) |
RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - HassLHoFF™ - 06-17-2014 Is narco also intended to fight? If yes a GB/Bomber should be added on the Consensus side. RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - SnakeLancerHaven - 06-17-2014 (06-17-2014, 04:09 PM)HassLHoFF Wrote: Is narco also intended to fight? If yes a GB/Bomber should be added on the Consensus side. He's intended to carry Code-X to Lambda, so it means he has to do everything to make it alive to Lambda. I guess if he'd intend to fight, that might cause him more trouble as your drones together with 2 Cruisers and the Wilde GB are dealing enough dmg. The primary goal of the Consensus isn't to destroy the Sentinels but to make sure that Shodan doesn't make it alive to Lambda. But aswell your secondary objective is important too, to eliminate the remaining Sentinel Units, but the Sentinels and the Corsairs will be protecting Shodan so I think you can make up the picture. The Code-X will be put on hold around the Sentinel Settlement at Planet Binissalem, if the Consensus make it alive until Lambda, from there on Narcotic can engage at will. (06-17-2014, 04:09 PM)HassLHoFF Wrote: a GB/Bomber should be added on the Consensus side. Also there is, check it out there is a Wilde Gunboat on your side. RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - SnakeLancerHaven - 06-17-2014 (06-17-2014, 03:34 PM)kenshin156 Wrote: Name: [AI]Canaan|Seshat Though you can't use a bomber bro, sorry. If you can, get a Fighter instead. RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - Narcotic - 06-17-2014 (06-17-2014, 04:09 PM)HassLHoFF Wrote: [color=#FFFFFF][font=Verdana]Is narco also intended to fight? You know, I can only fight in caps with .85 dogfight style. No autoaim. Still, the Necrosis is op, and I've got plenty protectors. Therefore I'll supposedly run like a chicken to Lambda. RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - Flash™ - 06-17-2014 Name: Sentinels|Ravager-Core Joining Side: Sentinels Faction Member: Yes Ship Type: AI Cruiser RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - SnakeLancerHaven - 06-17-2014 (06-17-2014, 07:32 PM)Narcotic Wrote:(06-17-2014, 04:09 PM)HassLHoFF Wrote: [color=#FFFFFF][font=Verdana]Is narco also intended to fight? Yeah XD RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - HassLHoFF™ - 06-17-2014 (06-17-2014, 04:40 PM)Snake Wrote:(06-17-2014, 04:09 PM)HassLHoFF Wrote: Is narco also intended to fight? If yes a GB/Bomber should be added on the Consensus side. But the wilde is the special ship...same as narco with its own slot RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - Zapp - 06-17-2014 Name: LNS-Tundra Joining Side: Consensus Faction Member: Special Guest Ship Type: Tundra Dependent on the time and date and how well my computer situation is after this weekend. RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - Christensen - 06-17-2014 Name: Leonardo.Vulpes[TBH] Joining Side: TBH Faction Member: Yes Ship Type: Fighter (kiss) RE: The "Carrier" of a new Era - Lowis - 06-18-2014 Name: Sentinels|Omicron Joining Side: Sentinels Faction Member: Yes Ship Type: Drone |