![]() |
|
RP & Core (I) bases - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Thread: RP & Core (I) bases (/showthread.php?tid=136187) |
RE: RP & Core (I) bases - Findarato Veneanar - 02-17-2016 Taxing pobs is indeed one of the worse parts of irl that have made its way into disco. RE: RP & Core (I) bases - VaaMerc - 02-24-2016 There's only one problem. The characters you listed don't belong to me. An Admin can check this for confirmation. Don't blame me for destroying your bases This is starting to become harassment. Your group is targeting me and my friends in Gateway simply because I left BMF RE: RP & Core (I) bases - Wesker - 02-24-2016 (02-17-2016, 06:12 PM)Findarato Veneanar Wrote: Taxing pobs is indeed one of the worse parts of irl that have made its way into disco. Its actually a really good means of income : ) As for the OP, no any lolwut can build a Core 1 base. 9 times out of 10 they don't even know how to RP on the forums. And inRP if a fresh instillation is in the middle of hostile territory or is built in a factions territory without permission it should blown up. You don't give notice before making something you claim to be your own in someone else's territory, it should be removed just as quickly by the people that own the territory. PoBs in general are bad and should be deleted. RE: RP & Core (I) bases - Malmsteen - 02-24-2016 (02-24-2016, 04:20 AM)VaaMerc Wrote: There's only one problem. The characters you listed don't belong to me. An Admin can check this for confirmation. Don't blame me for destroying your bases We are so bad and targeting you ... i think we need to be punished so we decided to deliver you an apology Here you go mate, you can show the universe that we are bad and targeting you Trial by Forum is a no no. You should know better - St.Denis Oh and thanks for confirming that you are Gateway Columbia via your previous reply Without you mate, many things would have stayed unclear you are genius regards, Malmsteen RE: RP & Core (I) bases - Wesker - 02-24-2016 (02-17-2016, 10:13 AM)St.Denis Wrote: It was decided, when the newest Rules on building Bases were introduced, that Building a POB did not require RP to building and therefore did not require any RP to destroy until it reached Core 2. Why are you voting on the decision if you just said yourself that it would make pretty much 0 difference. RE: RP & Core (I) bases - Malmsteen - 02-24-2016 (02-24-2016, 05:21 AM)Wesker Wrote:(02-17-2016, 06:12 PM)Findarato Veneanar Wrote: Taxing pobs is indeed one of the worse parts of irl that have made its way into disco. I am against deleting POBs but i encourage implementing a new rule saying: RP is required to obtain a blue print for core 1 deploy and RP is required to destroy a core 1 base. Think about it , it makes sense my friend. RE: RP & Core (I) bases - St.Denis - 02-24-2016 (02-24-2016, 05:30 AM)Wesker Wrote:(02-17-2016, 10:13 AM)St.Denis Wrote: It was decided, when the newest Rules on building Bases were introduced, that Building a POB did not require RP to building and therefore did not require any RP to destroy until it reached Core 2. I said that if a Player's Request was submitted, the Admins would vote on it. This hasn't got to this stage, as a Player's Request as yet to be submitted. Also, within that vote, we could amend the Request so that Core 1 Bases are more protected. But that would depend on how each Admin viewed the Request and what the majority outcome is. I cannot predict the future. RE: RP & Core (I) bases - Sabru - 02-24-2016 (02-24-2016, 09:15 AM)St.Denis Wrote: I said that if a Player's Request was submitted, the Admins would vote on it. This hasn't got to this stage, as a Player's Request as yet to be submitted. I believe you'll now find a player request has been submitted regarding core 1 base rule modification
RE: RP & Core (I) bases - HassLHoFF™ - 02-24-2016 (02-17-2016, 04:39 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: You do not need rp to make a core 1 base. You do not need rp to make a new char. Therefore, you do not need rp to kill him. Oh wait, there is something wrong. Pobs in terms of rules have to been seen as players in my opinion and regardless of the core RP should be mandatory to attack it. RE: RP & Core (I) bases - Jack_Henderson - 02-24-2016 I think that if a Core 1 base offers roleplay, it deserves roleplay. A base that pops up secretly at 3 in the morning, deserves none. |