Discovery Gaming Community
Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] (/showthread.php?tid=138549)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - Tabris - 05-11-2016

Believe me I'd use it if I could. However as it's from outside Discovery by now HIGHLY likely used in another mod we can't use it. (breaks the 'No Models from outside mods rule' they have going.)

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - SnakeLancerHaven - 05-17-2016

Bumping this up. Ofc if we can find our 4.86 Cruiser model and use it as transport, I'd have nothing against it 8|

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - SnakeLancerHaven - 06-06-2016

bump anyone on this?

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - Durandal - 06-06-2016

(05-17-2016, 11:52 PM)Commissar SnakeLancer™ Wrote: Bumping this up. Ofc if we can find our 4.86 Cruiser model and use it as transport, I'd have nothing against it 8|

Give me a name, converting it to a transport shouldn't be a problem.

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - SnakeLancerHaven - 06-06-2016

(06-06-2016, 10:40 AM)Durandal Wrote:
(05-17-2016, 11:52 PM)Commissar SnakeLancer™ Wrote: Bumping this up. Ofc if we can find our 4.86 Cruiser model and use it as transport, I'd have nothing against it 8|

Give me a name, converting it to a transport shouldn't be a problem.

"Hammer" works. LWB Have Sichel already else we would've used Sickle prolly, but go with Hammer.

EDIT: Well choose one, "Sickle" or "Hammer" I just noticed LWB uses "Sichel" and not "Sickle"

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - SnakeLancerHaven - 06-14-2016

So I suppose we have a yes on this? C:

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - SnakeLancerHaven - 03-27-2019

Bumping this up, @Durandal sooo now with VI around, can this be a thing?

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - Durandal - 03-27-2019

Oh hey yeah this. Vulk wanted me to re-texture the old 4.85 Typhoon model and scale it up to act as a makeshift battletransport. Not sure how I feel about the idea yet, the 4.86 version may be better and I intend to look at both side by side and see if either is workable.

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - SnakeLancerHaven - 03-27-2019

(03-27-2019, 08:38 PM)Durandal Wrote: Oh hey yeah

Alright cool!!! ))

RE: Coalition Transport [Need Modeller] - Vulkhard Muller - 03-27-2019

(03-27-2019, 08:38 PM)Durandal Wrote: Oh hey yeah this. Vulk wanted me to re-texture the old 4.85 Typhoon model and scale it up to act as a makeshift battletransport. Not sure how I feel about the idea yet, the 4.86 version may be better and I intend to look at both side by side and see if either is workable.

I can also see the 4.86 one working, my logic with the 4.85 model was it looks like it could have a rear bay door just pop open for easy cargo loading(with a little modification of course)
For reference:

[+]4.86 Model
[+]4.85 Model