![]() |
|
Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183) +---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389) +----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +----- Thread: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) (/showthread.php?tid=162355) |
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Kalhmera - 06-28-2018 (06-28-2018, 06:08 AM)Skorak Wrote: It's a model change, no new ship. So those should change as well. Is this a guaranteed thing? If so I am game! RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Durandal - 06-28-2018 Yes it is. New models being implemented almost never impact the lore to a significant enough extent that the old ones remain in the game. This is a low quality model receiving a high quality upgrade, nothing more than that. RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Reddy - 06-28-2018 the current LABC looks and is very good, don't think it needs a replacement. although this new one looks brilliant, i'm fine either way RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Sand-Viper - 06-28-2018 Do like! That engine mount looks more supportive of an Overlord-style engine than the current Bretonian-style the LABC uses now. Will the new model also implement an engine change? If so, will all LABCs be affected, or will it be a similar situation to the Hessian/Dragon/Core capitals? (I.E. Old player owned models kept their old engines, with future, new player owned models receiving new engines). RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Durandal - 06-29-2018 If the ship receives a new engine, whether or not the old ones retain theirs really depends on how bad the old effect looks. If it's ugly enough to warrant it (ie, the old Ranseur engine), we'll likely change all of them. If not, then we'll probably let players handle it at their leisure. RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Thunderer - 06-29-2018 It looks nice. But, the current one looks nice, too. Why fix what's not broken? RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Kalhmera - 06-29-2018 (06-28-2018, 07:04 AM)Durandal Wrote: Yes it is. New models being implemented almost never impact the lore to a significant enough extent that the old ones remain in the game. This is a low quality model receiving a high quality upgrade, nothing more than that. When do you think we can see this in game!? RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Felsvar - 06-29-2018 (06-29-2018, 01:33 AM)Kalhmera Wrote:(06-28-2018, 07:04 AM)Durandal Wrote: Yes it is. New models being implemented almost never impact the lore to a significant enough extent that the old ones remain in the game. This is a low quality model receiving a high quality upgrade, nothing more than that. As soon I am done texturing it, CMP it, hitbox it, hardpoint it, edit its .ini file - gets approved by Durandal, (it's already preapproved the moment he saw it). THEN YOU WILL SEE IT INGAME. RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Kaze - 06-29-2018 (06-29-2018, 04:02 PM)Felsvar Wrote:(06-29-2018, 01:33 AM)Kalhmera Wrote:(06-28-2018, 07:04 AM)Durandal Wrote: Yes it is. New models being implemented almost never impact the lore to a significant enough extent that the old ones remain in the game. This is a low quality model receiving a high quality upgrade, nothing more than that. tl:dr, let the man do his work.
<3 RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Traxit - 06-29-2018 make snubs and i might throw shekels : ) |